From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:19:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ipvwl1nx.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87aagn2tpr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrjquacf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj05svwh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp11imgb.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <8739mc5nes.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipuubao6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwpjfkkz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp072fb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5vimm5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zknjmcyk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjta2zvp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87liyzglkh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4DB77682.1070605@gmail.com> <8762q04ba1.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303906846 1693 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2011 12:20:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 14:20:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QF3jT-00031B-OE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:20:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF3jT-0000LY-5j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:20:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF3jL-0000LB-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF3jH-0003QS-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:20:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:45387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF3jH-0003QO-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1022046qyk.0 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:20:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eVzX6HvKj51INiT8Id7OunLXBddhDskbTAQZY5pwrkk=; b=SB4/Xt0SZcKRUXZtUrv1kxsDfwKqgotleCPqhbjnzbihlwon1ESOzSmFKh7Q08pcds DTxY+jMAhENRbpeAMs7S3V+YE1SLrL3slgopkrD86lb1C9zkLjh58Q+sbl/6eilt+qd1 +8zOvFuIIKWNYXM0DExwY8mAWqyK/HyhXA06c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kzTVGNlGO5LpozKmFghQGcMSuntwT3NWsyQm9dMP7FCXDeRvxFsDJhg1QV6muticp1 GtVCKDpIVCVx6L9A3egywnylD+oV6t+QQYWMs9rjs+BTXw7Rm1AmJFlwbXA3Zp4a70yr 9LXrlZo95Si6yhZJl7bTHPFNnSw+O0Uo34+7c= Original-Received: by 10.229.67.142 with SMTP id r14mr1627997qci.209.1303906827141; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:20:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.91.210 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:19:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8762q04ba1.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.216.176 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138847 Archived-At: 2011/4/27 Ted Zlatanov : > CS> Can we make it behave like for any of the graphics dll's, where the > CS> support might be enabled at compile time, but the dll must not > CS> necessarily be present to use Emacs at all? > > Sure, but someone with access to W32 machines would have to write and > test it, I can't. GnuTLS was one of the reasons that prompted me to change `image-library-alist' to `dynamic-library-alist', so yes, I plan to do it if nobody beats me to it. But I won't be able to spend time on that in at least a week or two, perhaps more, so there's ample time for someone to step in... =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma