From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:55:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wrj1jhfc.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <87hba5yq0p.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <834o64sxd7.fsf@gnu.org> <4DA3A7F8.1020503@cs.ucla.edu> <83k4f0qijz.fsf@gnu.org> <4DA3DDCD.10700@cs.ucla.edu> <4DA40AFE.8050406@cs.ucla.edu> <4DA47581.9010509@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302658974 18175 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2011 01:42:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jim@meyering.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 03:42:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9p6Y-0000ty-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 03:42:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42337 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9p6Y-000800-0V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:42:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9p2M-0004Th-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9nRL-0002H0-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:38084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9nRJ-0002Dm-SP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so48819gxk.0 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:56:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GE1rE3aJJutnoTQ51ERy+zR6My9f+iNiWgVDthahgko=; b=Z/iK7mQMMWycfgn3QCE6Vck77e8JSVbCWsMFbzlXE4LIB3GskTNIcJLLifxjB8PItl /v8UlrOiBzEglrMfQURCABJweLixBIaVFeIVbFaPIoj+DLVyTLUutIT4bIxmC0Q8iTy9 nSAAOlljG0j5XcKdaa6rhi77pBILAPkLT9KRs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VjIgP7093/NWdmqV7UvHPw4L5wOz7kBBq6GEexs3IWgSreGoh86RnuzD7SVhXXAKIH +S5u+b/raK5179ZlvOlUZ/YfMmXoVisa0snCgK+AzQcYGGdhElKF08sUykL4yzNyPyzt GlaVEze3GzOQvKdn59w+NgyXsdUm4K4kO2kq0= Original-Received: by 10.236.70.170 with SMTP id p30mr324420yhd.275.1302652569140; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.147.182.17 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:55:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DA47581.9010509@cs.ucla.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.161.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138447 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 17:53, Paul Eggert wrote: > I'm sorry if there are hurt feelings about this, It's not a question of hurt feelings, but about waiting for the discussion to reach some kind of consensus. > but size_t is > clearly the better choice for buffer sizes; If it were "clearly the better choice" there would be no opposition. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma