From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, jim@meyering.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:55:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimtjs7rQtpv+i-x1PaZfwivXo-KRQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA47581.9010509@cs.ucla.edu>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 17:53, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> I'm sorry if there are hurt feelings about this,
It's not a question of hurt feelings, but about waiting for the
discussion to reach some kind of consensus.
> but size_t is
> clearly the better choice for buffer sizes;
If it were "clearly the better choice" there would be no opposition.
Juanma
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 8:55 oops? read/write vs type of length parameter Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 9:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 11:08 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 11:28 ` David Kastrup
2011-04-11 11:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 12:27 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 12:31 ` David Kastrup
2011-04-11 21:54 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-12 4:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 13:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-12 13:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 14:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-12 17:00 ` Large file support (was: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter) Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-14 20:57 ` oops? read/write vs type of length parameter Michael Welsh Duggan
2011-04-11 14:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 11:40 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-04-11 13:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 1:16 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 3:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 5:06 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 5:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 8:19 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 9:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 15:53 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 16:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 23:55 ` Juanma Barranquero [this message]
2011-04-13 5:14 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 6:31 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-13 6:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 8:15 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 9:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 16:06 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 17:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 19:31 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 19:59 ` PJ Weisberg
2011-04-14 4:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 20:02 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 6:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 14:35 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 13:13 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 16:34 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-15 18:20 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 1:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-04-15 8:55 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-15 9:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-15 10:24 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 12:32 ` Davis Herring
2011-04-12 13:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 15:43 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimtjs7rQtpv+i-x1PaZfwivXo-KRQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lekktu@gmail.com \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jim@meyering.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).