From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim Cross Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Now: Emacs<->Mozilla Integration -- Was: Re: Feature change or bug - Emacs server Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:57:22 +1000 Message-ID: References: <87ei30k5xs.fsf@lifelogs.com> <46E492F7-19AC-4493-9D72-6B3BDBDF8633@mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450168f57b606104a5a408ea X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308025855 11960 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2011 04:30:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mohsen BANAN , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: chad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 14 06:30:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWLH8-0001gc-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:30:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWLH7-0002LC-EI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:30:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWKkn-0002K8-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWKkl-0001sQ-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:47796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWKkl-0001sK-6y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: by iwg8 with SMTP id 8so6056088iwg.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:57:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MBjWh529bv7OEBjQ77es7k2raachkHvZ33HVxx8xc1A=; b=Dn28XyNhI3RrT/qx1UJhgjiRjLv56sLVt0Sx9n40n/dXLc4vdNey4g+eTn8tlu/4+J 0OfcGQhYM0O+nd0iTEaIyiN2+dPQw1jT2Gs0Q+UMHygREkNWO905h9Y0wPwFzxcC7zdQ VSrbOZVK4O+skXFcNS01r8dycpAtqev81MvB4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=aralgU+Sd9duWpWEzz8+Y8A5FjiF2nndrfkYLIuJY8xdmSaIuYThBmDn7hUVxdSMu2 0R9B9VZdh4IkiixAcut2tgBL0HwLRIkYBrUxACJjW2ZHBnkJEeedfeihBlefSsOC3h5T VWyPhWORj+3W7PIrGFj7lxv926/LCJX1Buzvk= Original-Received: by 10.231.202.82 with SMTP id fd18mr6040678ibb.106.1308023842365; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.32.72 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:57:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46E492F7-19AC-4493-9D72-6B3BDBDF8633@mit.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140444 Archived-At: --0050450168f57b606104a5a408ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:37 PM, chad wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Mohsen BANAN wrote: > > > I am very interested in knowing people's thoughts > > on this approach. > > > > ...Mohsen > > I can tell you that we talked about this sort of thing in > 1994, and I suspect that people's thoughts are the > same as they were back then: It's an interesting idea, > and we'll certainly look at the code when someone > else writes it. > > *Chad > > I don't think anyone has suggested others do the work or are even asking for others to do the work. I would characterise the current discussion as an exploration of ideas and discovery of what others have been doing (such as the webkit wrapper package mentioned elsewhere) which may be relevant. Tim --0050450168f57b606104a5a408ea Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:37 PM, chad <yandros@mit.edu&= gt; wrote:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Mohsen BANAN wrote:

> I am very interested in knowing people's thoughts
> on this approach.
>
> ...Mohsen

I can tell you that we talked about this sort of thing in
1994, and I suspect that people's thoughts are the
same as they were back then: =A0It's an interesting idea,
and we'll certainly look at the code when someone
else writes it.

*Chad

I don't think anyone has suggested others do = the work or are even asking for others to do the work. I would characterise= the current discussion as an exploration of ideas and discovery of what ot= hers have been doing (such as the webkit wrapper package mentioned elsewher= e) which may be relevant.

Tim
--0050450168f57b606104a5a408ea--