From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failed to compile from last bzr repo Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 00:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87vcyugxgs.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrjab38x.fsf@gmail.com> <83d3l1x6i6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301954816 30549 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2011 22:06:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Sean Sieger , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 00:06:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6rv8-0002qO-LJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:06:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38276 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6rv7-00072h-IE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:06:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47777 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6rpG-0004EP-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6rpE-00012g-Qr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:00:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:54114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6rpC-00011K-KN; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so4660237qwa.0 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:00:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XX2lS0J20E6B/SYzxV8jXBUiyHAjdBY9HQ1lMDv0Yn4=; b=ZKmi8a9hPyepMpf6kPZfo4x98ntpzON6dbDKGDUqlw//SS1aiHlIswkR9H71k6HT7W a6vPBFw96U0/1EJzD9EFiLBH3TTTUk+TZzyP9srhtLyZx15Q1jTC7Wu/KplrcoEZV3z4 vT8TzgviqYrax1TE6e8X6NI1JF+SORaatubhU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OXB8twGPi0BhWlK1i/dZb2ht7qfyqQcc2foeQeODA3VhWCf0ctgF/heCcKyj+LAwHY 15Yw0bw0q8ZcEBIHya3T4AFlC0gqknEB216Ng9dceDfoezOjb2s8aT0g4ky0UjGgdYoV HLEzp4rt9kND4eIvA92SmsSVNsxdjzC4x6KLE= Original-Received: by 10.229.202.42 with SMTP id fc42mr5699217qcb.272.1301954442099; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.6.17 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:00:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.216.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138156 Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 23:51, Stefan Monnier wro= te: > On one of my setups it takes about 4mins (8 dual core AMD chips help), Now I'm envy. > takes just a tiny bit loner (especially with -O0 and all assertions > enabled). Because of it being slower during all the .el compilations, you mean? I regularly build both -O2 --enable-checking and -O0 --enable-checking and I haven't seen much difference, but now I'm curious. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma