From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How does the Emacs bug tracker work? Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:47:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4E0C44A2.1040604@dogan.se> <874o37tqq2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309444129 17031 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2011 14:28:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Deniz Dogan , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 16:28:45 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcIEV-0000Tp-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:28:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49954 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcIET-0001VN-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:28:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcHbh-0008PM-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:48:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcHbg-0002pI-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:48:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:57506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcHbd-0002oV-1q; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:48:33 -0400 Original-Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so2302420pzk.0 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:48:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aeXUIEOSgirwAOihJZW/SPdGW4daf1dMZlo9BSeIh9g=; b=StVnubzwa3/pauA/QhUgjCR+iI3VD2osZvcV3wQw0+fEcxG3Xhm2vLyLhzL0i57F+T S+wp2SXEh2Pb0x03vdJZJ2za0SaP94FlsltwenAY3p5e/0gvpS0WRx1rtvGlYcHST5eX 4gMlc/zK8LI91GBA4e4G6/gGorqI7Yg5RsLdY= Original-Received: by 10.143.66.15 with SMTP id t15mr930843wfk.278.1309441711084; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:48:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.142.50.7 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874o37tqq2.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141232 Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 15:04, Jason Rumney wrote: > Note that the word used was CLOSE, not FIX. =C2=A0If you can find 5 bug > reports per day that are no longer relevant, or perhaps never were, then > that would count too. What about Wontfix bugs? Shouldn't we close these? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma