From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Yates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH update2] Support for filesystem watching (inotify) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:59:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <201106040034.15598.ruediger@c-plusplus.de> <201106050136.35939.ruediger@c-plusplus.de> <201106051149.39037.ruediger@c-plusplus.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5171f1bdb16ac04a4f91092 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307289573 28449 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2011 15:59:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger_Sonderfeld?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 05 17:59:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTFjd-0004Dw-Dl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:59:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTFjb-00011v-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTFjH-00011O-Nt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTFjF-0007lf-Hz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:45062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTFjF-0007lN-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: by vxk20 with SMTP id 20so2981862vxk.0 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:59:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kjs/QDslzZ1B9XpDa/KHB8WXeA/tjTmlNIhMiQMunc0=; b=wYcW437uVMqso6dFb6s7CYPH29iz9q8IJOGZD82nUClnykCqhwmbJP8miOvSpW0FpT EMX8p6Vd40W/ZSVUITbgmh1KljJmRrmQLJmJ6U5n9cyPQMBDwv4c28UTXuPK9yoiIHmc MRinIDM2RpFkVwvyWQX7uN5eBiULrUq2G7fCI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=Mar+cyqRxuckZC8EOK4q+FbXMK49pa2Se1wq2aXwADActtHISG3T8AgzR3CfZAms+A G4ZV2PrRiMiRVommocoz06gdfzwk7682rcmkio7rO04LXQ9OwB3uIbwsjnrAx1u9mrAC hXy2ypG95dRcJjderDCQGpY0lkrewLJEbrNvE= Original-Received: by 10.52.179.131 with SMTP id dg3mr4415076vdc.9.1307289543448; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.52.182.66 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 08:59:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201106051149.39037.ruediger@c-plusplus.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: JBfj4v1IgTV4pKG16FtYvAdnv8I X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.220.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140200 Archived-At: --bcaec5171f1bdb16ac04a4f91092 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is there a good reason not to provide access to the full functionality of the inotify API? - Why conflate IN_MODIFY and IN_CREATE? - Why conflate IN_DELETE and IN_DELETE_SELF? - Why omit IN_OPEN, IN_ACCESS, IN_CLOSE_WRITE and IN_CLOSE_NOWRITE? /john --bcaec5171f1bdb16ac04a4f91092 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is there a good reason no= t to provide access to the full functionality of the inotify API?

- Why conflate IN_MODIFY and IN_C= REATE?
- Why conflate=A0<= span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse; font-fa= mily: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; ">IN_DELETE and IN_DELETE_SELF?
- Why omit IN_OPEN, IN_AC= CESS, IN_CLOSE_WRITE and IN_CLOSE_NOWRITE?

/john
--bcaec5171f1bdb16ac04a4f91092--