On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:

> If bzr is not satisfactory for some reason, then please open a
> discussion with arguments about replacing it, not just add yet more
> noise about a different way of checking things in.


Chong, Stefan, do you want this discussion here?
I wasn't under the impression that this a desired discussion topic at this time. 

I don't think we need another mailing list to discuss "emacs development on the git mirror".

Your point is well taken about the git rev-ids.  Maybe we can set up the mirror  so that the Bzr revisions are mentioned in the commit messages.
I agree that a common VCS would be preferable, but one wouldn't want to risk alienating or losing contributions over it, right?  So, it would be mostly beneficial for Emacs development if more people can make commits or produce patches using their preferred tools.   An open solution, rather than a proprietary one, so to speak.