From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuan Fu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 71ef012: Map redo records for undo in region to 'undo-in-region Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:04:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20210311223946.8801.94147@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210311223948.2A4E320B2E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <871rclz07w.fsf@gnus.org> <1328F7D7-74BD-4262-A25E-6A25EDF84D88@gmail.com> <87o8fpxi8f.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1641"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 03:04:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKXAh-0000I7-LM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:04:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58120 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKXAg-0002cV-OR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:04:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKX9z-0002Ab-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:04:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]:45889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKX9x-000398-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:04:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id m186so6239568qke.12 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:04:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Bd9FmFQzwbu5YS41npuJqx27UehC6cMiWlbNcpQzf3I=; b=rxQETZnpTZ6AaRBe8UZfERh9AFG2UNvcSiQzveY5BCg2Q3OIseDQppdQuGPqDoRoCd X9vYbHELVzAqhdwzg8iJVWBERksHiUA0SJJZzUlEOpLwm0nqfLVskDjNnxaJNQIwEjMf 0+LhYpoRJRpesVwPu04U9KJFb8L1SOv879nWhjCcCW3EsNr1NjmQqXeUCbPrGe4xH19Q kpekAf+9tURzJ9Grtm8MpC8qidqPaa8INLiGbHQ2XOP+HTLxImgq2sOXJxMS7+EZOsob p/h5cWQqKayCQKBUifLhhKM/u8hGi+1tpUXMRkOL97m9AXrs/VDi9NLYcukvetX0Y4iG pPbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Bd9FmFQzwbu5YS41npuJqx27UehC6cMiWlbNcpQzf3I=; b=moVbtjLc/Uv/PyIYq+JHwpHDtelDEx/QJuusrJAYs9wMcLT4k1GZYeuDCZkrlv5IiZ dBn1+2QQ3V7r04hnZ0c8b2sgDDzvnfDvPHc/xJNZY9rBP6ki+2vxEK8soJJFNUD0rsDM KysNix/2viC9kpNVxf2a/Vnfewf4DCbfd5YX8XeC6VZdc3G/XSl40bJt4PrvJGTDohgV 9BPEPHE7JvszOJdKc6NdkamacopMbTQcN1IfzIpiuaeAi8yLebTmC7ESeVI9BJVQ4Gdw gdNsFWwNgLSIAr7R0riX6VoKMc+dTae7jeOE1k4xfVQOiUTbMhC2Ni96ZAdmz1L17maV qhGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qHeeIdnX989J2KhqtTwjsRCthoBXxrafFNovzPAyZ7XhOjMw5 GMNj4Gr0s4sadxAgJoBoZLXYSdeDwFY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz7LiPLKKS2RYHX1KqLX0OR2JTzPmAgSHy7CkCUrHodVEi1x0rv2AGLt08KH1HP4U9f+R1lw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a643:: with SMTP id p64mr10233065qke.276.1615514652053; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:04:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:98a:4102:3d80:d922:4b2:658b:de44? ([2601:98a:4102:3d80:d922:4b2:658b:de44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l65sm3374416qkf.113.2021.03.11.18.04.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:04:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87o8fpxi8f.fsf@gnus.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a; envelope-from=casouri@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x72a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266381 Archived-At: > On Mar 11, 2021, at 8:40 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >=20 > Yuan Fu writes: >=20 >>> This seems to lead to the following two test failures: >>>=20 >>> 2 unexpected results: >>> FAILED simple-tests--undo >>> FAILED simple-tests--undo-equiv-table >>>=20 >>=20 >> How is the test above ran? Maybe I can setup something similar and >> investigate. All the tests passed on my machine (with master and -q). >=20 > cd test/; make simple-tests >=20 I see. It fails when executing regional undo. Does Emacs not have = regional undo when running in batch mode? (Maybe push-mark-command = behaves differently?) Yuan=