From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Miller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 15:24:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <01341bd6-b94b-4f94-1461-405e723142ad@yandex.ru> <8ecc8848-373b-077e-dba5-63884632760f@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26499"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: philipk@posteo.net, danflscr@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, lokedhs@gmail.com, Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 07 16:02:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNbfz-0006hQ-LS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 16:02:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNbfy-0002y0-BI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:02:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNb63-0006YM-OC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oln040092070033.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.70.33]:15691 helo=EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNb5y-0007td-Pn; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:25:07 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HYwOxf4aicPWWoqR4PmmX6uDrkiRR2/YG7B70rjKRMBRoBpxT1mnVywBxRrPmsUJ/S1QLrmoSg3wjnFECeQgKmN4kioGy2xJUHjRxtqr0FFh564I31kv6QsNHmAa/TL3ezFgM+iBlOHMVzIyo6KsoRnD7TGkh4ZOcyI4wNjL1pUkK0xVDUc9LspSgl6X/vdcqv173iwtECD+CoUoxxe04x+f77y6BwK3WNUcx8cLpT0fjh7xxtYvJtoCw1tsZvQqfBiET2sReAGHwl0InMNC3WQh1AUHjq2sa3mqNjx7N9ONgzihpG0eUsPIKyEWNcTECnu1ZU24CgvWqjj+6Elp/A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=iR+SlZNw0vPqA2hRHfwmvZw1lL+Ct/rkI1KXmB/3sgI=; b=C+TDqNa9/uW1NKllJao3j4aiSKJG2t9JLgtSu1KPYNiRMu3CviIAYRvmW2yWFobw0XWOjlvXXpHy3s9s2Z2ez5q4rTUrLG+eN3OzAdsUZjGmk+Xfz2Kjz9+VO8tCuwB9prR+9eZmrX2ADGu/ZiD3wXFxyolIiFxC6/aLY/vEOpH4RMBkBdAJBsr0/63laYQPoqPj7ijm2q1AVNd42UpBuRCAwGwzXuWmGCzfgr4/u2w/OEgeMjfEXmucPz3Xb0Rb+F6BmjIbNr7IKZ13HGW7CWd1N6cRjReV92Zfnlod/fvf0gVRhi+9zL/X0OKBkbknlyW0wiRjLf1LD6mNhu+qEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=iR+SlZNw0vPqA2hRHfwmvZw1lL+Ct/rkI1KXmB/3sgI=; b=aEDrky3zFO92u/jowuWGMK9ja0kQRYn01L22DdWnS7Kbj8QHH5fIhC2hkMxelbPEPvbqLNUfw6CqObWDEkyAIzDiZ+ZC4qAAMneJuSZh0Co5er/tv9r+lNCZHB9boSjahDz2WQ2wNByxxKXy4fs/tjrt61MMGAFhXpQCcOALYENYAYwqWLewlO8SxfEq/eRuEAgJ3C5tbsstoIgl6kEwxNB4/GcqZQGpS53UhZINsu+AJV2BUUG3K6QRcyYa6kd4X+VsMo7HiicPg8KaR/F7H+3FI8quJja2Jc0iu2b4pEwzNddnD6oE26iiMddOmfkS6XYYPG15o/jWYq80LjTHLQ== Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:304::20) by AM9PR09MB5011.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:30d::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4500.14; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:24:59 +0000 Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c55c:ece5:bed2:a9dc]) by AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c55c:ece5:bed2:a9dc%9]) with mapi id 15.20.4478.026; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:24:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: <8ecc8848-373b-077e-dba5-63884632760f@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:55:25 +0300") X-TMN: [su5M24oak/cy6huwXv0G4vVo9/qJuhvS] X-ClientProxiedBy: AS9PR06CA0244.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:45f::35) To AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:304::20) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <87zgsoa579.fsf@live.com> X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Original-Received: from pascal.homepc (81.232.177.30) by AS9PR06CA0244.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:45f::35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4478.22 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:24:58 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 273417fd-2cf8-4b5c-b234-08d97202e404 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM9PR09MB5011: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: AGWzi9Y8RuuiZ0Y3c8HIr7kleEEzS6WabhUtfnrW/yy8C859SNCG9/Z/k3WL5CBGhoGyD341jyuxthBp/sokc9V8HIGTufHPAi6MQ1qXQgfycPuf6tpUDNVQNfdvYr4cwVbvhQ3aUBxrxHVf7TCqRrBuxZry8jJzO3iPqkkXAaVUzLn+nNpK5ED+7o2sqh33Tv5UH3T5YCDfImiFPiJPPq+nZtt2i4Vqr+G80hgVQUoGsAcVAOWBB4AmR2EIYd7nQpIGsN/PFNgsGi9wIGxfOq9idd1aoBEW1MsnyiZ9OmoHumfEt4twLYqNa35LZ8u9rQ6wvFIp+zroqhn9XwbMwkvJLQ18q3bIVb5FlFD2WsLGRqrjoV1rx+dtbvc3+aq2oN4aQnLpoUmlyPWtZ8mvZY/us9P5b2SqQbAoQkXFlxD+J4QpQSJ+K3cPHRSPQcyL X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 2oEM1pq3x0KMFbIvSUZW3oW8HF2yJi/ydASlbFR2SbF7/5f7lvDGOnSZIQofei1RIjTZmD95LSFAaT90DpLFUF59p00RAHUaco64Sp4tsA4w1I2NWSvFR99IPT7EVHWLvzP8wZ1p2fp0Nmdiz7/s5g== X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-20-msonline-outlook-72e6e.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 273417fd-2cf8-4b5c-b234-08d97202e404 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2021 13:24:59.4741 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM9PR09MB5011 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=40.92.70.33; envelope-from=arthur.miller@live.com; helo=EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274241 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 07.09.2021 15:49, Arthur Miller wrote: >> Dmitry Gutov writes: >> >>> On 07.09.2021 07:56, Arthur Miller wrote: >>>> Introduce an extra prefix: C-v? And put undo on C-v u, and windmove undo on C-v U?:) >>>> V is next to c, so all prefixes follow next to each other x,c and v. >>> I think the current subthread is about adding 'redo' to the default bindings >>> set. That would mean not touching the existing bindings, much less the important >>> ones. >> Are there any kyes left to add anything new? Adding new prefix to defaults opens >> for entire new setup. Maybe some hard to hit key combos could be also rebound to >> something easier on new prefix. Yes scroll would have to be rebound, but is it >> whole world. You give something to win much more. > > I would be totally fine with 'undo-redo' being bound to 'C-?', 'M-_' and > possibly 'C-x U'. At least as the first step. > > If we try to increase the scope of the changes, the odds of anything happening > at all will get much slimmer. true, for the scope of changes By the way, I am using M - _ as undo since years back and works fine for me. I always thought it was the default :).