From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Miller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Which is faster: narrow-to-region or delete-region? Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:10:09 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32807"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 21 22:11:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mSm6u-0008JP-Mv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38840 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSm6t-0000aj-He for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:11:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSm5q-000806-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oln040092068069.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.68.69]:27982 helo=EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSm5m-0002Ie-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:10:17 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LxBL983iGH/vf2Y5cQo7MxHGtijE3vrvZdjJ8Hk5IyW8ofSHF94Xul/HbTW5rKv5My9A1FTXTQbsN/85JI0f9Y/NtyVUFrnP6OkfAvRWIbYGGhWS1MOsfqX59LsqD/d8vEwyeR6OFPPsSZQ35a+vJysYSareX3aGm7G9XA6am1CnblGlvaa7qrgPG50kofhRZZSYHxK48morG3eZfJvBmPY8Nj+i/J4t9bG67pWFYGtPSgTL+L/lRyDOAm/UJ+C/L3dUcwVodA5EG4mI2WSryPhE/LErO8sP+ZB6Rs4UdMCVCb/sAcE9pl5PqP2ofPbiEAwP02lGafMZbKOUvniqvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=V/iCNfMImNb4KvtT8XHr/gjpKrK2PvYvix0TMnL+E8o=; b=cSeZd5oTXUkqjZKzvyIEGQLuFGfcaA/5XCENSoBSVJio1X4zz4qUyLPCq3u6oJTpS4bHZyMWcJFnFU6R5ArYOs9zKhnfplPVGBvc577MQLrP0oWYH/YwZ53JnqDC4v/mup1yp4Jaha7zyetZioHK9ayz8Rt9oRwqe9+WSDaMUmb/+w+QeAm4Ji4Go4dYjjOd/tP21N1T61sDvd4odA7CpEIHDPm8V+3Ku/WZ2RxAK1TjSIjAfZ5YvU/UghQpHugPm2rY32gUzB1HyoGilmj7Wn3Kxr7wSlJg8hNp2qTH5bnXxyQNlmF1w0/YFRTDefqNv2+3LOtoMyvNsucOqsKxcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V/iCNfMImNb4KvtT8XHr/gjpKrK2PvYvix0TMnL+E8o=; b=KrmLe/OZxQycD+x3crDwhJyOEyAVyI/IdHWMDHYyYYLrcMqPasCLajKOr5RXL3YmpkyV28/bv1JlsmdThThv9lKUEbgrmKJxdG0hvI0+qcwozb1Qn1WEryuzLvDqRlEBWboMWmzKpjFIGcO1QeFvYxkf1Bq7xu8C7R1V9vikgYXUEAFXnY1yWQ3h9JU37hCK182xYc2k77e/MgridPTxB4qs6OY1YAqwwvsokpmLxGb3558KRkWwsb2yNO3Mkcjo9Jdp6sLAJARGyNo8OY6fb7hVBSDJVmn3aPxM/THFSQz4OdiIbNGoG5S9UjHyniqoOq7CMQWQiBnW4u68ek0AnQ== Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:304::20) by AM0PR09MB4466.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:160::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4544.13; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 20:10:09 +0000 Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c55c:ece5:bed2:a9dc]) by AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c55c:ece5:bed2:a9dc%9]) with mapi id 15.20.4544.013; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 20:10:09 +0000 X-TMN: [r3o9VcsE66SrTzr0wvYGlolVjT8l3U7L] X-ClientProxiedBy: AS9PR06CA0293.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:45a::9) To AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:304::20) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <877df9r8pq.fsf@live.com> X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Original-Received: from pascal.homepc (81.232.177.30) by AS9PR06CA0293.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:45a::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4544.13 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 20:10:09 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: d0dace60-1b64-444e-a6b5-08d97d3bd005 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM0PR09MB4466: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: ZPTXr3BSGRoBiDMGJObCplZ4SqMzXVsms3RHYKSVBohqaOL9h2qiwLfRNz+IIqhPKBYeL7ghKbmBDkW0wxb94s0U/0/xRsIv5i1y/puTGCb2qe775HhlgUhCvPEE/G2v4uiqFWis7p5zb9+32jm46uouIbsAYp3gpDHVivAmdPCNDjUKH3W+TEt1pKPfhwxErSvghBVS48ro4YVJ6VgAhYfF3k0VA0o1NdaAwhJuHM+GRO4SHtJXW1DYDFpwxw2BbX42GZlm64Frab+6/NTB7UEPkmIfhFQ+b6YYRWFipy3DUTdW/cS4BSH6EyGBeAwSMYRmhhujHxqYGx70O/XuGgDro78jMzdqd+ZseiYdJXVZpxph369yupBzvPi7fFzMDvRQXFEC9X0cs4AUgO/8uU/4uKSkTBGwxhT6LbEMNEFX6056nM3Aemi5aZ2Dw2cF X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: 4A6Lq3TFimBeiSv0CPxH2dugaGpW29NiJDLlu1QcYzQ3QnrhrnTEQy2/YzpJfW/7juzwrlfPgpZS6sCZ/bM8rhwHaNgPXmcz/513zwcyghS5r5WnLC4hoiYKzsNBpcJjH5Nr/TGfbUMVOMZJxXyEwA== X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-20-msonline-outlook-72e6e.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d0dace60-1b64-444e-a6b5-08d97d3bd005 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Sep 2021 20:10:09.9505 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR09MB4466 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=40.92.68.69; envelope-from=arthur.miller@live.com; helo=EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275269 Archived-At: I have a DEFUN in the middle of a temporary buffer; which is faster to use to eliminate the rest of the code from the calculations for font lock: (narrow-to-region defun-begin defun-end) or (delete-region (point-min) defun-begin) + (delete-region defun-end (point-max)) I appreciate if I can get A or B answer so I don't have to benchmark, if it even matters for the speed? I have tried both and notice no differences. Looking at the code it seems that narrow-to-region is faster, but I am not familiar with all the C calls the respective function does, so hard for me to tell. The feel say narrow-to-region.