From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Miller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:55:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1ca462fa-0f9e-3c18-6386-f43f49388b2f@gmail.com> <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus> <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru> <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org> <831rjcmgn8.fsf@gnu.org> <897b82c2-8ec2-60c0-f5c3-5ab98f79fbd8@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23692"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, nicola.manca85@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , drew.adams@oracle.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 12 14:56:40 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kH555-00064l-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:56:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41856 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH554-0003LD-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:56:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH54Y-0002vP-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-am6eur05olkn2040.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.91.40]:57408 helo=EUR05-AM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH54V-0001uk-0d; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:56:06 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fgITuEJgt8mmgDL1a4nWWdjNGDPVjzV6x5r6anXtdQt25sKTY4yyMsBSjl+knWzuhFiFe3U4hrvZQmqCDp0eiiHS2/1NePqeL8xvZxB1C5ti/gaSZ7ZCQL3xKXYV/4sS6m+GsqA5X0AMmo5Gq5OvJojSp+eOSI96G3SRQ3H32cWU1fGfhMXn++WdLR0I4sLtZxVBltG0DMSYCPvdXJjimg1IHTGh0aBKqv+wV9ZiF8KLlqPhHqPPcRfsJoMpNswAqxihmK8kcTXCYY1XdaYtL0VE38mI8HSbMgFMS8b/Tgse9V2N9IGjzaashdIKA4YdLaW8Nxh5FF13fh4H5xe2iQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7KUhRT7GfjhkGTZgE8BEDzeAKbBIw7JZjJRdRTE0A2c=; b=lyJkoG1zHEQFzZk5Uv/qkZn5UzCbfi9gKvA7GaYpxFgzJpBoaw+o+pFEFOJ1RjoZG88ymuxO+OhHCxj8L/Y2Sf8K1LFghF1caxwtrgeCsuPyYyjvMIOjvuyU+cuiqk6vTAyl8eQDv1oJvKIroonq9z5ksFtgHzLPQ2mb6b5FlD9XruA/BMAzxMjzPldSR5u9yUlcpLA0ZkwVS5vYd+VRHeRKo6oy5dyNZ/cMmn/UAejqM3fEtvhPB1eaRA2ME/QWhG6C3+KLx/OwHlkjj/zUBGdylNedQO3OB0oZDIYuwrWZmC7Rl1f+9l4oVSyr5aHmtJD5aIqutHSK+tiL51MIQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7KUhRT7GfjhkGTZgE8BEDzeAKbBIw7JZjJRdRTE0A2c=; b=L8FTS9nXo7vcPdJ5xHjOFvCqcRAmeBfYRxZmlc7VMPUOSNktPMcQHSK9pLy6BVEM+YtqAL6qVSxRQq1r6FDXyIH8LDdaI75sobspRbm8t15ppdYA4z596qZ80AZfkNRzzk5DZ1N3ynmnCA1iNHDbVW2RPSKaqTRLo6dkMi5i+6BJKiE3MZkdGmoBkpyF89IcJNdC+vwCcUJ9QgsZ0QGPkBAhL0iIToq1xQTH4PBHuE0EEOSLOFPb0fqMXzIendZDqASh8nBGD2EGiRyLipQsdQ0I9p+3SViIS9yn+fH8F0ZWFx6W8UAu3C7RL2dv0mvqhw6GrdW2ILsGWvLOSOAs4A== Original-Received: from VI1EUR05FT004.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc12::4c) by VI1EUR05HT108.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc12::321) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:55:59 +0000 Original-Received: from AM6PR06MB4518.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc12::4d) by VI1EUR05FT004.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc12::283) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:55:59 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:65BD280AF454E4F4A7A850F59405B109A45253C7DF3946A1AAA02E1588DEE6FB; UpperCasedChecksum:4A4A9CF6FE5C192E916EF0B3086AA77821017204775A9075D4D67E3767745823; SizeAsReceived:4154; Count:46 Original-Received: from AM6PR06MB4518.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2884:1e69:b3f7:6dd8]) by AM6PR06MB4518.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2884:1e69:b3f7:6dd8%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3370.017; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:55:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:32:27 -0400") X-ClientProxiedBy: AM6P195CA0002.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:209:81::15) To AM6PR06MB4518.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:6b::13) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <877dsztaqp.fsf@live.com> X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Original-Received: from pascal.homepc (90.230.29.56) by AM6P195CA0002.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:209:81::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:55:58 +0000 X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <877dsztaqp.fsf@live.com> X-TMN: [pW06+JuE+gSPFAODKAsh2hpuVEWoBG2s] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: d5c80ad9-ba59-4fac-3636-08d8571b3203 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: VI1EUR05HT108: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: gJAkRlc6P4v5ugY72JDuKaWngVIg12FL8IeTrb4Zy/ZKRGWDOZYcvcd7OAOTIt4jQUmov3Dp476Cv2zAvm8ZfdU5TpJBSheQq1NytsS55qSGXMFoFmKCebKRTmy3XmQRhX0d9JBVC8Y53A5MAmd5wI8viGKyO2QSbHxhIAjPNcnWDK6IXy/pyoZToe27kUeV X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 7XnkicHPOz4Xs5t0KDhqVfg1OlOxCq/3q270m8OdYaZ0AXH4ak4yKJ8O9fEVQutI8FgAlEXS1kO1Iq8wdYuaaRpLVuBJS7lWr2DWrLU2a7CvDgEbxSBbAAOfl7Aj/87q7JZ7Xpf3THo75wIFBoY4jw== X-OriginatorOrg: live.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d5c80ad9-ba59-4fac-3636-08d8571b3203 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2020 12:55:58.8889 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VI1EUR05FT004.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1EUR05HT108 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=40.92.91.40; envelope-from=arthur.miller@live.com; helo=EUR05-AM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/12 08:56:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Windows NT kernel [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255334 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> But not those who prefer undo-tree (which gives you just as much power >> as Emacs's undo, with even more control). > > BTW, I think using the `undo-equiv-table` we should be able to make our > undo system more beginner-friendly, e.g. by providing undo and redo > *and* telling the user when he's reaching a point in the undo history > (tree) where there's a choice to be made between undo-only and redoing > something that was undone earlier. Yes, it sounds like a good thing. Just give a way to turn it off.