From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Equivalent of release tags with bzr? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:50:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878wclfso7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r5qdxw7h.fsf@kobe.laptop> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262238661 25602 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2009 05:51:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:51:01 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs development discussions Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 06:50:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQDvx-0008MQ-RU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:50:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44566 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQDvu-0004Uy-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:50:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQDvo-0004Ul-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQDvj-0004UA-8p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46535 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQDvj-0004U7-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:50:39 -0500 Original-Received: from splat.raeburn.org ([69.25.196.39]:52679 helo=raeburn.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQDvi-0007ny-OQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:50:38 -0500 Original-Received: from squish.raeburn.org (squish.raeburn.org [10.0.0.172]) by raeburn.org (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBV5oYtL011523; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:50:34 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87r5qdxw7h.fsf@kobe.laptop> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119115 Archived-At: On Dec 29, 2009, at 17:16, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > If your local branch is not bound, then you can "bzr push" it. You > can > ignore the slightly misleading message "bzr push" will show. For some > reason bzr treats tags in a special way reports that "no revisions > have > been pushed", but the tag is installed in the remote repository as one > would expect. Well, a tag isn't a separate revision, is it? So the message is accurate, if misleading. Perhaps bzr *should* treat tags specially in that pushing them upstream should be noted, or at least the "no revisions pushed" message could be suppressed or altered. Ken