From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:36:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <43b24209-fa65-0e26-7cbd-f99175a7ffd8@gmx.at> <87wnx7j5is.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83im8qnyca.fsf@gnu.org> <83bleinmse.fsf@gnu.org> <56435592-d2d0-5fb6-977f-01e1931da835@gmx.at> <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czyvkts6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bleetirr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21515"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, rms@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org,Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 28 10:37:06 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktoxd-0005Ub-OK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:37:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57586 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktoxc-0008S7-QZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 04:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktowu-0007z2-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 04:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktowt-0000JX-Gz; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 04:36:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:4df7:1:af02::1] (port=37076) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ktowm-0003PP-AR; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 04:36:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bleetirr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261991 Archived-At: On December 28, 2020 10:52:08 AM GMT+02:00, Juri Linkov = wrote: > >> The same way we could add a function with old implementation of > 'y-or-n-p', > >> and depending on an option use either of them=2E So two new options > are > >> needed: to select an implementation of y-or-n-p and and also an > option > >> to choose either to use yes-or-no-p or y-or-n-p with shorter > answers=2E > > > > Could you please make such a change? >=20 > Martin suggested to add the "use the old implementation" option > to Emacs 27=2E2=2E Is it OK with you? Yes, thanks=2E