From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Sieger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20110131 windows binaries Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:33:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87aaigbqbm.fsf@gmail.com> <4D48A55F.9060200@gmail.com> <87y65z9sc9.fsf@gmail.com> <83ei7rccar.fsf@gnu.org> <4D48E5C4.3010502@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296661987 29745 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 15:53:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 02 16:53:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkf0v-0007vU-Is for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:53:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pkf0u-0005D9-8k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58057 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pkdh7-0004vH-Ep for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkbuI-0000cv-NO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:33:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:46275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkbuH-0008Hy-Be; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:33:57 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so496322bwz.0 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:33:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a+xMxKABC2sCqwou+8fCnTLT1VNofLJB+mGmYZPLwgM=; b=ONgwItLJ8vQT+hs0Rl3xa7EQ4T8aXU6FnUgSA9lkw/eOSL5wFs5qsGlM4vig4Z6zzk JBrpM+mHeFlDf211xsG55sxkcW+yhjaDV4uB8+FWk+VhMJ5+TnOlOZHilXgcmoB4pddE kCYfqp+O1xJgXvHXOpWaBNtt4aYp86oTBOhao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mGGDTgNUlb0Gs55KAv+3062IlCng8g3I1LTS1XDhnsHLBqL71x8i3H/nrmTnwOzhjS Z3adkK/kkg3CEnj82uMb0hymF2lSi1nFKwhpUfVd4XTmlmUENFLsbGP7P41RtZ5BYGWs nmjcGCqMLm33XlDDQG0Wv1UjCUucV5pvO0L4g= Original-Received: by 10.103.221.7 with SMTP id y7mr4275187muq.96.1296650015055; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:33:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.102.22.17 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:33:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D48E5C4.3010502@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.214.41 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:40:49 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135461 Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Christoph wrot= e: > On 2/1/2011 9:04 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> I can only say that "make install" does install these two programs in >> the `bin' directory. =A0So it's probably some problem with preparing the >> zip files. Not when I did `make install' just now. > I just tried a make dist and the zip file does not contain those two file= s. > I will look at this tomorrow. > > It's strange that the last weekly build contained them, though. > > Sean, are you using make dist to create the snapshots? Christoph, thanks for asking. We had a similar conversation last summer when `make dist' wasn't present in emacs-23, but instead I used the older, `makedist' that I copied from a version before the changes that became make dist. (I hope I am making sense here.) I have continued to use makedist for emacs-23, but use make dist for the weekly builds. Another lacuna is the README.W32 in the pretest. Um, I haven't had a chance to check for it ... hold on ... yep: 1) the `makedist' command that I use to build the pretest distribution is looking for `README.W32' which isn't there anymore but instead is in /nt as `README'. 2) regarding `make dist' in the pretest: c:\Users\Sean\Downloads\emacs-23.2.93\nt>make dist make: *** No rule to make target `dist'. Stop. 3) the question I should have asked eight months ago, can your fine changes be merged into emacs-23? (Ya know what I'm saying? I enjoy using make dist, thank you.) I hope my observations make sense and help.