From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hl-line and visual-line Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 15:10:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <45790724-63FC-4B80-A70D-8CD49A92FEE3@gmail.com> <8339xmqob9.fsf@gnu.org> <94F28B33-A04E-4511-B93D-E5471EE4D0DE@gmail.com> <201005210834.28589.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <83wruxpt2z.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274533873 13363 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2010 13:11:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 13:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Eli Zaretskii , Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 15:11:05 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFoTl-0006DY-24 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 15:11:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFoTk-0004bt-3o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 09:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56775 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFoTd-0004ba-0J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 09:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFoTb-0002Ct-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 09:10:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:60033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFoTb-0002Cj-S2; Sat, 22 May 2010 09:10:51 -0400 Original-Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so1218368gwb.0 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 06:10:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=b2GFCNzsYUik3G//nwc04EoHnHtk67LrLOMQ8Sl7/2M=; b=vu/u5X64tbjxTN7kGu/gRDEEj+EY/0SJ5V1Jvzdp3hlQuBDE+BHXP1nglEEIFZDYCw Da67GY1b83NMLkfGBKOu/jRTSsnB6DytJJgQDJ+UeRVKJvIHecTVi+/VOTngI1d8D6nR oWECDCC32kM0fL/8Y66kIkCX3A9rimGl1GUhw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=rZ2kGtJjZ7qhPUfrL9eikB3CxmTh+5M72CHdcbFEFDEMk1bkbM6CSY7JNmASrrIAFO +vGOV4FAvLCmQXBWmXbts/m13mg3N5uo59F0RaH+kbcoKobugyKp9IXiYGlbyOnWjkKa eN9hDdUFNx4ZdF8KuCOZ5Gcfn9q4BA4awyvmQ= Original-Received: by 10.101.203.9 with SMTP id f9mr3421988anq.208.1274533851173; Sat, 22 May 2010 06:10:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 06:10:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125066 Archived-At: On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > > However my current patch does not work as I expect in one regard: When > I use hi-lock with text properties marking and an overlay with > negative priority behind the text the hi-lock faces seems to disappear > when I mark again with hi-lock. I can't figure out what might be > wrong. Any ideas? Just my bad testing. Just need to collect the patch.