From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CMake build anyone? Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:47:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87aapfxyhc.fsf@telefonica.net> <87wrsjwijl.fsf@telefonica.net> <87sk37wdlj.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280091077 3798 80.91.229.12 (25 Jul 2010 20:51:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 25 22:51:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od89q-00044m-2o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:51:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Od89V-0002Ag-21 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:50:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57610 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Od88H-0001nt-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od870-0007BV-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:47:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:41052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od870-0007BF-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:47:54 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3008039bwz.0 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XLeSbxkM3RhQjDE8wLYeBZwmb+EtO2OT4WW7tlNDzMw=; b=S1vMvVbuwTaV7sPl7B+aWEvoYC7jepXpov6wpaAtru6Uq0yriYwGtxNbZMNnPbc/wb NfZeOsjuIaHcNDKBXL7+PbB+fwSRIzxOSRGzQ+5X9QYZJ2mkbKgKcIN876RAe9DrIhH0 pyBo/JkxM8mHuZ/SqfMEPL2v2lv1XI5RAfDUM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NvJftAHq8tpisWLSfWXPQZXayUW8hOFboWZnnIbfTtbGRiUwkLgD8zNK4Tmo6sa7KC 0UhPjWfJBzLWllUzFziREpSZtusriIqchGwKfuUl8IABb6J4hknpzMf0e1PGW1ufuk0p YCjpmeUQ8FQLAZK3lOnWvZw/aJ6zj2SgVNqJA= Original-Received: by 10.204.1.139 with SMTP id 11mr4653728bkf.174.1280090873193; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.180.136 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:47:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sk37wdlj.fsf@telefonica.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127797 Archived-At: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 21:44, =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > Based on my experience with LLVM, which build process was more > convoluted than Emacs', I don't expect problems with the Windows > build. I'm starting to think you're an incurable optimist :-) > AFAIK the Windows build follows the > same logical steps as the Unix build, but working around the limitations > of not having autoconf etc. I think a more accurate description is "most of the same logical steps, in slightly different ways, in sometimes quite different order". Windows makefiles are based on old Unixy makefiles. Currently there are many differences, some trivial, some deeper. > Okay. If you make it work, you'll have my gratitude. Maintaining makefiles is near the bottom on my least-palatable-things-to-do list. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma