From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:53:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.47167.15000.439215@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87fwys7qao.fsf@telefonica.net> <87hbj8qvd9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87iq3k68ye.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874of466rj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pqxsbrie.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87k4nv7t72.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <19556.28233.750000.798692@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87aaoqjzge.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxsqzfam.fsf@telefonica.net> <87wrrue9sk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iq3ez21o.fsf@telefonica.net> <87eie2yttd.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281743626 25137 80.91.229.12 (13 Aug 2010 23:53:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 14 01:53:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ok44E-0007K0-Oq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:53:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34105 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ok44E-0001R4-1z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:53:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57962 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ok447-0001Qy-4D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:53:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ok445-0005Hg-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:39022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ok445-0005Hc-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so1539040gwj.0 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:53:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eQRKPOaRDAIKMquZEY6qNqK1+kyvcF8p4oQvzafrWKU=; b=ABIOT2rM5g58Z4YbieWFkgoLBqU+5sA2F7Fs2o1Pk20mcQAc+iobCTCGErV/tBHZrk NbwmbzQyHB6H85s5P3U9J5ZTlolyMlOQMKzJMMu9Zn5mROKF5S14NHV3vWbpAg7japoG eapA/jwOOK1r2ZF4OTUNKgPEUuPwr/OZwOsus= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xalGavFtwqALQE2o3LOOiMldpqCcTI9I9zcrlV1qQ8LdXoIqBhBmXKB7wgAR6781zz 3b76V22LyycRQmVRfW7fg4k1ozISJN/5xq4xatwWk+gJ0Igi+ObxuHDtDj0ulaIeYZW7 J1RE4xjYzFmzxkdRzPbZvwpzDBcoeKH3ajeX4= Original-Received: by 10.231.146.136 with SMTP id h8mr2469940ibv.0.1281743612164; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.151.132 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:53:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eie2yttd.fsf@telefonica.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128641 Archived-At: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 01:30, =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > Try explaining to someone that a tool he is supposed to use for hours > every day doesn't follow his platform's standards because it supports on > other platforms too. Do you use Emacs on Windows? How so? Were you able to overcome the apparently unsurmountable problem of Emacs "not following [your] platform's standards"? The amount of problem, and the lack of adaptability of Windows users, are being wildly overstated. > Seriously, on this topic I'm happy with what Emacs does now, but this is > not about my personal preferences, but about if adding an option for > turning the Windows key into Meta would be appreciated by some users. No. Nobody is against an *option*, so it's not about that. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma