From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Scot Becker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: daemon mode breakage Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:13:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4CBF0BA7.3010102@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a40d89899c04930eb1bd X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287593800 3908 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2010 16:56:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Neal Becker , Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 20 18:56:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8bxt-0005Cu-QS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:56:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8bxs-0003ZN-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49066 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8bfV-0007er-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:37:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8bIR-0005CU-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:64181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8bIQ-0005Bv-27; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:13:46 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so3022533fxm.0 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:13:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RP+cb5wukk3TLF25jcnmi0FULbvLaDRrV4ie1pZ0CQ4=; b=aPD5Qg6b1IDXIZAqW0LNV/ZMGvfr3JON+gyygI1OX3C2ntYBWfATW/MuHFZ/bAPDuM AS4TKcW/u9HuhGeeFY6GDeSJ0wFCgGY0IQwUDgFnZuDq0eonY1jPyY8L1XJkLX5Kx4vZ vJhkozZ0t/bOyyMoh72INfEc6xZuw6KnLm8EA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=bBvH0fxujAVXQIxr3cbYylrd6AstQbT6v6SWkImAIFBBDJT+UO62SZ3QO02CJUJaIv yl94ufVSxaAxtnpnyubD20Z1yxdsZdiJTWqNCOneKMGnySiNlVSuFahCUevcEy/jR2uB FIHrCUX8iKw+UTVmiNx5iPgyQ4m7Uog+yEBWc= Original-Received: by 10.204.113.196 with SMTP id b4mr1034609bkq.176.1287591224248; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.114.135 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:13:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CBF0BA7.3010102@swipnet.se> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131898 Archived-At: --001636c5a40d89899c04930eb1bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan and Jan, Thanks. I think I could live with that. On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Jan Dj=E4rv wrote: > 2010-10-20 16:58, Scot Becker skrev: > > Out of curiosity (I experience this bug too) what do you have to give up >> if >> you compile with Lucid? I assume that anti-aliased fonts would go. >> > > They won't. > > > Do you >> loose the ability to use proportional fonts as well or is that handled b= y >> Emacs itself? >> > > Everything in the edit portion is the same. You only loose the Gtk+ look > in the tool-, scroll- and menubar. > > Jan D. > --001636c5a40d89899c04930eb1bd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan and Jan,=A0

Thanks.=A0 I think I could live with that.

<= br>
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Jan Dj= =E4rv <jan.h.d@s= wipnet.se> wrote:
2010-10-20 16:58,= Scot Becker skrev:

Out of curiosity (I experience this bug too) what do you have to give up if=
you compile with Lucid? =A0 I assume that anti-aliased fonts would go.

They won't.


Do you
loose the ability to use proportional fonts as well or is that handled by Emacs itself?

Everything in the edit portion is the same. =A0You only loose the Gtk+ look= in the tool-, scroll- and menubar.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Jan D.

--001636c5a40d89899c04930eb1bd--