From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is unbound? Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:13:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sjx7z7w4.fsf@telefonica.net> <83pqsbmf6j.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4ijz07h.fsf@telefonica.net> <2460D97DEA4047B3B9DF92C4A80981EF@us.oracle.com> <57BF13882D6E494286547F293FE9D03B@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294888470 13984 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2011 03:14:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stuart Hacking , =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Drew Adams , Deniz Dogan To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 13 04:14:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdDdg-0001qk-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:14:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdDde-0004id-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:14:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53515 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdDdH-0004bI-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:14:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdDd6-0007uQ-L2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:13:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:43172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdDd6-0007uM-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:13:40 -0500 Original-Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so623856eyh.0 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:13:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YhHiXa/fI67Yq9umk8dU7H9nTNrTPyvy/CYZmgMI9C8=; b=DJQgMlPRdfA4mUckkgbocZw+jT84ONUBGemj+o7d6sljO0F6qyMbK2vcbZSmMC5eTB xgUcClRcu8Wjqid7jSOlGiOuQTIz2npbDnzGsbn3WOfSquVLbXN/RJOLTha9ZIRC5jLG 5bFawlzZLvKgFJAqX+OOONwqGhgwyc/krqqVE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bfUV+EIoyE6ogpoRGWb7cI6bxvP3o/41xQurEiVfNT6c56S5OTIMNAtYVnzLYU1O60 OuhlY19syYwWDrmY5WPcYTGHJ4vf+d+WerihVrcmbxfJqeP8iATpyBExykmDGDlnSrYG U5Ry2sxJcAqHcZTlE2ZQ+jNocTaYuFDdmWBOg= Original-Received: by 10.213.29.16 with SMTP id o16mr1890703ebc.58.1294888419235; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:13:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.20.148 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:13:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134480 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> The proposal was to bind M-f4 to save-buffers-kill-terminal or a >> similar function on Windows installations only. > > I think handle-delete-frame would make more sense. On the page Drew mentioned, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/126449, it says Windows system key combinations - ALT+F4: Quit program A couple of things to notice: - It looks like the window manager could handle this (but Emacs bypasses that). - It is not M-f4 it is Alt+F4 which is very different. > Maybe binding it (in w32) to handle-delete-frame would be a good way to > implement the expected behavior, indeed. Then bind A-f4. > =C2=A0But first, we need to know how > it's normally implemented in standard confirming applications. See above.