From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Differences between ibuffer and dired Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 00:36:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871vbmnaxk.fsf@escher.home> <38165C775CE64A828DB8008B087373F7@us.oracle.com> <87fx014k3z.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278110201 29979 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2010 22:36:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 22:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Berman , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Drew Adams , Deniz Dogan To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 03 00:36:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUoqc-0000QQ-W7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:36:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUoqa-0004YE-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53832 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUoqV-0004XS-KZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUoqU-0005Z2-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:47618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUoqU-0005Ys-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so1343697ewy.0 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:36:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=+heIxOHTJ5lSGCrhsKlttLTi4lALrGDHmA3omY/Hqj0=; b=FVZpVLHa4SjH/8/cNMwiaqPPQMFY9Qpf0Uep+umLykpTqq06zHPTyqvR7OTyXban0Y 0z9t8xlwU13GHOM4FoC0QXSpAnLwa1KSU1j38q/L6I9KoCgeWia0geEjgOMmAxMZQMCw RcUTXsEyBd5aeOiivLivvFwSLB82pivCeRBZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=oRDJcP9k1DqSOWaA0OEVUoEeFTsh3tOB3bCsON8815tGh922DAqNIqArmMNVUqN7Uh BjxnARIiqWAKH0WSB3kW2d+8gK1mittSncEkMxRQ6PCuNt8GAegEcQBQ8Xp/nTtVEiTS 1Y4RFKXR2k1amEmcTV81yRlwUvIRxVcntHuH4= Original-Received: by 10.213.31.133 with SMTP id y5mr1262547ebc.68.1278110188223; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.15.132 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:36:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fx014k3z.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126717 Archived-At: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Juri Linkov wrote: >> While we are looking at this: Wasn't there a discussion before about >> putting ibuffer on C-x C-b? I don't remember, someone had something to >> say about this. Was it Juri? > > Do you mean this thread? > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/91359/focus=91388 Yes, thanks. It was a very long thread. I think Stefan and others said that ibuffer.el and buffer-menu.el should be merged.