* Unicode 6.0 beta
@ 2010-06-04 14:46 Juanma Barranquero
2010-06-04 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2010-06-04 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Emacs developers
The beta review for Unicode 6.0 just started. I think it'd be useful
to upgrade the trunk to use the beta Unicode 6.0 data, so any problem
with it can be detected as soon as possible, in accordance with the
recommendations from Unicode (at
http://www.unicode.org/versions/beta.html):
"We strongly encourage implementers to review the summary description,
download the beta 6.0.0 Unicode Character Database files, and test
their programs with the new data, well before the end of the beta
period."
It also says:
"No products or implementations should be released based on the beta
UCD data files -- use only the final, approved Version 6.0.0 data
files, expected on September 30, 2010."
but I don't think we're planning to do a 24.1 release before September
30, so it should be no problem.
Comments?
Juanma
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unicode 6.0 beta
2010-06-04 14:46 Unicode 6.0 beta Juanma Barranquero
@ 2010-06-04 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-04 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-06-04 17:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2010-06-04 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Emacs developers
> The beta review for Unicode 6.0 just started. I think it'd be useful
> to upgrade the trunk to use the beta Unicode 6.0 data, so any problem
> with it can be detected as soon as possible, in accordance with the
> recommendations from Unicode (at
> http://www.unicode.org/versions/beta.html):
Assuming there's been no odd license change, then yes, we should
probably switch to that beta data in preparation for using 6.0 when
Emacs-24 comes out.
This said, it's probably not very urgent or even important at this point.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unicode 6.0 beta
2010-06-04 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2010-06-04 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-06-04 17:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-06-04 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: lekktu, emacs-devel
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:06:58 -0400
> Cc: Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
>
> > The beta review for Unicode 6.0 just started. I think it'd be useful
> > to upgrade the trunk to use the beta Unicode 6.0 data, so any problem
> > with it can be detected as soon as possible, in accordance with the
> > recommendations from Unicode (at
> > http://www.unicode.org/versions/beta.html):
>
> Assuming there's been no odd license change, then yes, we should
> probably switch to that beta data in preparation for using 6.0 when
> Emacs-24 comes out.
FWIW, the bidi code is already compatible with what Unicode 6.0 adds
to UAX#9.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unicode 6.0 beta
2010-06-04 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-04 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2010-06-04 17:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-06-04 20:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-09 2:42 ` Kenichi Handa
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2010-06-04 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Emacs developers
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 19:06, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> Assuming there's been no odd license change
None has been announced.
> This said, it's probably not very urgent or even important at this point.
Installing the Unicode character data file and updated
lisp/international/uni-* files is trivial. Can I go ahead?
Juanma
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unicode 6.0 beta
2010-06-04 17:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2010-06-04 20:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-04 22:02 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-06-09 2:42 ` Kenichi Handa
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2010-06-04 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Emacs developers
>> This said, it's probably not very urgent or even important at this point.
> Installing the Unicode character data file and updated
> lisp/international/uni-* files is trivial. Can I go ahead?
Fine by me. Maybe Kenichi Handa has a different opinion?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unicode 6.0 beta
2010-06-04 17:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-06-04 20:41 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2010-06-09 2:42 ` Kenichi Handa
2010-06-09 3:52 ` Juanma Barranquero
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kenichi Handa @ 2010-06-09 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: monnier, emacs-devel
In article <AANLkTimS_zwAItJYB7xZrDezddrVcpXo0dx0zLu84QKa@mail.gmail.com>, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 19:06, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> > Assuming there's been no odd license change
> None has been announced.
> > This said, it's probably not very urgent or even important at this point.
> Installing the Unicode character data file and updated
> lisp/international/uni-* files is trivial. Can I go ahead?
I have no objection. But, please take care about a newly
added property value (if any). If there's such,
unidata-gen.el may need adjustment.
---
handa@m17n.org
PS. Sorry for the late response. I'm now in a hospital and
just got a way to access the Internet. From now on,
I may be able to read mails once a day or two.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Unicode 6.0 beta
2010-06-09 2:42 ` Kenichi Handa
@ 2010-06-09 3:52 ` Juanma Barranquero
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2010-06-09 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kenichi Handa; +Cc: monnier, emacs-devel
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 04:42, Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org> wrote:
> I have no objection. But, please take care about a newly
> added property value (if any). If there's such,
> unidata-gen.el may need adjustment.
None is documented.
Analyzing UnicodeData.txt, the only "new property value" is this one
1F521;INPUT SYMBOL FOR LATIN SMALL LETTERS;So;0;On;;;;;N;;;;;
which has "On" for the Unicode bidi class, but that's surely an error
for ON in the data file.
> PS. Sorry for the late response. I'm now in a hospital and
Sorry to hear that.
Juanma
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-09 3:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-04 14:46 Unicode 6.0 beta Juanma Barranquero
2010-06-04 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-04 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-06-04 17:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-06-04 20:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-04 22:02 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-06-09 2:42 ` Kenichi Handa
2010-06-09 3:52 ` Juanma Barranquero
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).