From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories? Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 21:20:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83sk5io7vx.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocg6o3dx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274642477 30301 80.91.229.12 (23 May 2010 19:21:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 23 21:21:14 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGGja-0005FR-1l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 21:21:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGGjZ-0007UT-9i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46196 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGGjT-0007SJ-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGGjS-0000Ue-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f220.google.com ([209.85.217.220]:46003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGGjS-0000Ua-0K; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so1373621gxk.12 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/IzX50Dm5sfTEI3jNAOnckyrUPYe4qxP2GC3Qcr8+Ss=; b=CTXjx398VQ8l9CLgEIlMEIb0+yYbUKXSxtI6m+duWHZXh/YqEW9OxJN3VCCzUTABjf OmWWRMfkVFsD59GFFgQpwmChKosaGoOYFfNLfp8gX4HDxfn5MBe09VYIAgWIF/J53ZRH Jilepd2GBBFL7zyaV5g86S0lYP3/aounx5TYo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Pb6K/Kok4PigvDNrrqi4R6MiflIp27NRwC9qe1xuxAZBc5xbIfSHzgzhqajQ1blqII vkKOOOGK7f+MvBsqxRxk2QiX3Xwaoa0AkbNJA20td6pLE9pzmmj7N/kpSyKlsKzXcNBN 77APTzYqPkcweQ8tix8m2FHxIg8odQYZ7V5pY= Original-Received: by 10.101.129.7 with SMTP id g7mr4961189ann.84.1274642465155; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:20:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ocg6o3dx.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125149 Archived-At: On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:28:13 +0200 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> From: Lennart Borgman >> >> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:13:22 +0200 >> >> >> >> Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes in the s= econd? >> > >> > It depends on whether you configure with or without --no-opt. >> > >> >> What is the reason for having both? >> > >> > To allow you to have both optimized and unoptimized builds of the same >> > sources. >> >> Thanks, but how do you use that? Don't you to rebuild all the C >> sources to use it? > > Yes, but so what? =C2=A0It only takes a couple of minutes. > >> And don't you do "make install" after that? > > You don't have to if you don't want. =C2=A0You can run the executable fro= m > its src/oo/i386 directory. Thanks, I see. Yes, it seems useful.