From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Wrestling Match: lisp.h vs rest of the includes Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:46:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281467300 12197 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2010 19:08:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 10 21:08:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiuBJ-0007i5-Qg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:08:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44317 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oitrp-0007mq-Fy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52154 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oitrb-0007lC-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oitr5-0007gi-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:47:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-px0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:46091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oitr5-0007gW-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: by pxi5 with SMTP id 5so316048pxi.0 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:47:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZkzxlD9c/LJBaJqQBr/KwFigkKI5N2C1dcPvDj//A8k=; b=svLNUTTIAsNNB5UYgrigpp4t72ocvaEdFNouJnPB1l5lB0GU536XbVAc+vt2iMxqvB 22DuLy4rytwKnPMiiy3eUVA4d2WtP88zwgysPvcHcbEUadGho0wG5ju1gAHS3l/xxF37 qYy5rE/5XCmJqijL/YFwrCOgX6hil4AgMVArE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KHbHMdCjGm/jVpTMON7UYP6c5ywzKKRJOye4isEYu+9YXS5c93L3axm/gwDP2W+OnJ io8FVngw4wIBm6ITPB4kI8M1+A+KGmbej0QGxugoyr9cEBPQvaueSvU2DZMS03enMDFW 1IEFVbrcF/Pm+43xb6jdJIiEr5INJBucinRZA= Original-Received: by 10.114.125.17 with SMTP id x17mr20794000wac.22.1281466038524; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.178.5 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:46:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128556 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:22, Stefan Monnier wr= ote: > Indeed, we generally want to move them to the specific .h that > corresponds to where they're defined. I'm very glad to hear that. > Why did you choose to keep the lisp.h version rather than the other? I haven't seen (or haven't noticed) any tendency towards moving things out of lisp.h. Otherwise I wouldn't have asked. (I didn't commit the change anyway, it was just an example.) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma