From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Selection changes in revno 100822 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:16:33 +0900 Message-ID: References: <834oeyv3ww.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxsqyp98.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83zkwptyij.fsf@gnu.org> <87tymx38m2.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83tymxtuzm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281788253 16479 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2010 12:17:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 14 14:17:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkFfr-0002dl-DJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:17:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34377 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkFfh-0003JC-E3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39406 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkFfY-0003Hu-0Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkFfS-0001zO-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:48849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkFfS-0001zI-0V; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7so1780549yxs.0 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:16:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=k2Nl1tHVmQizxsusSpXUG9RdG/pIKogJpMb7EX+cY9E=; b=VOG7XyZ91mvZpvuB48UHhDh83PomoG8ZWIgzFAQMjdEdu4LpUldrkJxxpBG6hPKw4u 9SrqzD8FMN/z6sSD+s2frjyJOGQ5+FSIwDHDnvEKdhr6lnntLYfcINfrSZdSofmls6HW Goy7hEJ88zsSBKX56u3A7JVL2lGI1IPcYqTbU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=cLkG/4/7x5n9TK1JwToEWGSB1UT51f9g1M4oy/F4DPTgyoJXAjcbLRKx3/mzLqpENU 0Kxezz5rPtAgB2PaPTbk4wcudIf2kODjYClJ11mykfXIlfRH9SfQIkPegpmUcI2oz5LB FPoOMcUjTA8gkuhNPCOKYy8Nrv9hEEhE830Eg= Original-Received: by 10.231.77.155 with SMTP id g27mr2493679ibk.195.1281788213227; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.146.65 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:16:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tymxtuzm.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cil_Lce10jLYnKAvwIOp3B3aD6w X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128678 Archived-At: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > Perhaps we should solve this inconsistency the other way around: have >> > shift-selected text be copied (under control of the same variable). >> >> But, then shift-selected text would be inconsistent with other methods of >> selection > > Which "other methods" are those? The usual ones, e.g., "C-@ " -miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.