From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:01:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87oc6vm67v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vd12z77n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ipx289cu.fsf@nzebook.haselwarter.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296687726 14012 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 23:02:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 23:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Haselwarter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 00:02:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkli5-00032a-Hx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:02:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44452 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pkli4-0001Ah-RA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:02:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43391 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pklhz-000188-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pklhx-0006EV-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:56246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pklhx-0006EO-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so390691ewy.0 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:01:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=K8Q2dlBlYvOyokBQI1oLDd4uxkjsenGsi4B+fxEfddE=; b=aErqqE12zuks/t+D9++0OB47jaIpUJIblfIrL6EncNmN7RHimNK7IJeRx49PnjwPI/ NW1rY9mxb4uV6wE/rvhATzzp18JBSYjeysZtvUhqOIKy+0pcUCpr2ITzJTWPX1I/itgm ILe2gm6pVOS1kW1Kf5ppQkbKLXKRpbq/uZuFM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=v84ivjSDzJwAcp5b22g0KJYuFmAqOh/7Y+X4mp3y8yLTXhAN6Vy15xjuz0DN4VhUJb FzHHGFVq4JSR6HVuuUTHg1cPsYZLBBbkGm17AaLculikKTIP9VzWSJ3mnmx5xVzoLKzl /UeA9vg2o0qYfyChcoGDNmVX2sThZjVmGvkXQ= Original-Received: by 10.213.32.143 with SMTP id c15mr12563043ebd.67.1296687712720; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:01:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.13.20 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:01:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ipx289cu.fsf@nzebook.haselwarter.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135490 Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Philipp Haselwarter wrote: > > Why not have a font-lock-warning face and a font-lock-error face? +1 And I would also like to see some set of "state" faces, like "wait", "ready", etc.