From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/gnus/.dir-locals.el Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:08:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83aanyhrnz.fsf@gnu.org> <5n1v95koyt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837hiq5dh4.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp814l5x.fsf@gnu.org> <838w354f7i.fsf@gnu.org> <8362y94egs.fsf@gnu.org> <834odt4cd4.fsf@gnu.org> <8339td4a47.fsf@gnu.org> <19lj75ibdz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284419386 30836 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2010 23:09:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 14 01:09:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvI9g-0007mp-I0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:09:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvI9f-0003bK-Ul for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45920 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvI9b-0003bF-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:09:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvI9a-0003k9-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:09:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:35374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvI9Z-0003k1-V5; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:09:38 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so7970627iwn.0 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:09:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7rZkQgKHQ7F2rgOMIktnEjFvvJlMc/mvf3IRNGMJKwU=; b=Q7JU86iOLW+EvxbJe9md7jNwAm9XCLNNvENzaR+XunH045cFaXnxRMFfIwawppW5GY r6nLl5NrXd3mQGnSUSrMxxl0Ek5wL413P8mtbD/mMoVVdqfkUj379oScCFuodxIEuw/v 2koOUeFRftFcA38E7GJaTFHYHb/QbPCMeuuBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KfqMbLGe/9XK/2poTil0Dx0VLmFNR7OwioI1ng7LvCwH5Hz0ipcUt8ENCs1Ehtrrom VEti4nNPK1rFtRSHHh6F4x4RFF6Jx1wYaw7AuPtpCi5L3R16/P+rFCCPAtvatWDDgnG1 jqgXPIobfuUcEkndlYN/DgdkNbKMY6qMf+Mkk= Original-Received: by 10.231.17.130 with SMTP id s2mr6879405iba.99.1284419377214; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.150.195 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:08:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <19lj75ibdz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130105 Archived-At: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 23:25, Glenn Morris wrote: > It was only supposed to fix the Unix `make recompile'. There is no > bootstrap issue on Unix builds. Because of the fact that *.el does not expand dotfiles. Which is, as Eli said, black magic. > If Emacs is explicitly passed a file name via batch-byte-compile, IMO > it ought to try and compile that file regardless of its name. So > either change the Windows build to exclude dotfiles That could be a bit of a PITA. > or simply add a > no-byte-compile cookie to any .dir-locals.el that might be added below > lisp/. Yes, I proposed as much a few messages ago. Apparently, Stefan disagrees. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma