From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <87vd9j5neu.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <83sk4misf2.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq5hiiin.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0lihov.fsf@gnu.org> <838w6cixma.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6ech1oo.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocf8gx7e.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0jgxk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig3gspa.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpb7gp2g.fsf@gnu.org> <837hlvglvh.fsf@gnu.org> <834ogzglaj.fsf@gnu.org> <8339wjgg8w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6eagb7g.fsf@gnu.org> <83vd9eg9j1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5k2g1qa.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig1g21p.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaqpfu1m.fsf@gnu.org> <838w69f61l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277120960 3872 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2010 11:49:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 21 13:49:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQfV3-0004i6-EH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:49:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQfV2-0006e6-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50979 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OQfUx-0006ds-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQfUw-0006gG-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:34403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQfUw-0006fp-19; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1200217bwz.0 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:49:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=EIJYk9GPsK6eB/OXdWcRaJ0UNUI7zit3/5LLcGdViEs=; b=W8M3uqZdRm2xjdU/G1H/HVQU9NkrwaNAzEurpJKIufo/+v86vvybYyNvmzVxN+NTp6 0jbWf82ddIGE0zYHqQd/ToiDk0v0P1Geo4THnzZRQgsFxU4gNzfA3ol743gUMsSMyTE6 hTTuRuv4knhc6qbkcrBBd6R31AB6qgSc8vWE4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kn8KcFNT/MOYd2IaEboxa3+7Qvvm2ePG/iEQ6t0gFEPxBm26DzzA4aisvkMcKcZ7db WcybjqhPrAqUi1A7PoQkU3rZRQhrzT6lH7xWhoeG5twSZm+OcoiNrMCB4MZv5ZtDfww6 bnIS6FB2EHLG4KjB+2MqGIFgaXY2RodWFTWCo= Original-Received: by 10.204.4.66 with SMTP id 2mr2828027bkq.214.1277120944608; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:49:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.24.129 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:48:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126300 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 13:41, Lennart Borgman wrote: > So I just did what I did to see if this could move things further > without anyone got too much feelings of being insulted. OK, no big deal after all. > Yes, if we can get back to that. That'd be good. Juanma