From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hl-line and visual-line Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 18:54:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <45790724-63FC-4B80-A70D-8CD49A92FEE3@gmail.com> <8339xmqob9.fsf@gnu.org> <94F28B33-A04E-4511-B93D-E5471EE4D0DE@gmail.com> <201005210834.28589.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <83wruxpt2z.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274461516 6956 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2010 17:05:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Chong Yidong , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 21 19:05:15 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFVes-0003C2-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:05:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFVer-0000YW-6J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58116 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFVUb-0001e0-Ql for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 12:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFVUa-0000WJ-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 12:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:47124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFVUa-0000VJ-Az; Fri, 21 May 2010 12:54:36 -0400 Original-Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so748947gwb.0 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 09:54:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IFpNDLEaQb/nJsbmqDnFfCCi0/VLngAPOf7Q8d+b6DU=; b=Km+P7BEeIoKGpfeZE0nvl1ZmXDa9iBM2P2W1T0o/1lJSB1hnZvCGPE8yEqqB7HVPFO nOosJ+BuQjILW/Nm22Z/HmjR0nqOU+rMoRy1pVgIMV5r8SROxPzpSGwWfFJcT7WuNrLL 4jdABZTzFybRYLCo8C97uN5SJ02xbG3brtODM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IptTylstjVlPMCysAn0E/HUVrDZSSIdqD1ofgjJJCy/Uo5pmb102aieGTC+ADw440n gjK/9BI4y+o8zqje+gLn1uqxd3UZNy2IFpXYVH4s8aDyUrjKlwgkM3imJlDyZp7WFs5g viVWpqdC9LYaHDpk5bE0A/giqu1894Q2pSpYo= Original-Received: by 10.101.106.33 with SMTP id i33mr2694457anm.161.1274460872278; Fri, 21 May 2010 09:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 09:54:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wruxpt2z.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124996 Archived-At: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> At a first glance, that would be cool. =C2=A0I like hl-line-mode, but I = have >> to disable it in some modes, because the hl-line-overlay's face >> overrides the normal font-lock face > > Fixing that would mean introducing some feature that will allow you to > request that an overlay's priority is below text properties. =C2=A0That > sounds like a simpler change (we have negative priority values vacant > for that, I think) than pushing line highlight to the level of the > basic redisplay. Could we please make the change to have overlays with negative priority below text? I have asked for this several times. What is holding it back?