From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:35:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201005280821.31181.tassilo@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275042940 24964 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2010 10:35:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 28 12:35:39 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHwug-0001jv-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 12:35:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40332 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHwue-0001iO-CD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:35:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56234 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHwuS-0001gB-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:35:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHwuR-0004J7-3x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:64916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHwuQ-0004Ip-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so895923fxm.0 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 03:35:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=+cPWNyDXktcw+zrC/8LMVm4pJn6nyzsVWcmEwkZqY4w=; b=pZz9O0a/5IYKnoDq4YNFuUQyZue+oCZj5cxZdAMn2By8uiKK+RIoslNLsPgRkXeQpP 9z4bw4D5vt7ARGLZ4VCP+M18IYXBEMQ7S7GXI+xkuMQTutpiKs6K/08zgU9YOwoUe3sb 3h1pNq4kRzxlto5FCQp7O56gLGW3GZldBB8ks= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=lT+wU7LypKns0uFUQEZ0oJls25lAe2K4iWslXsYs0bchRpMkiVLoArrwsknxJc4XvI C3PLsYsKd5AYIuZliRBmGJAawb6lsrRuxENlsPk/dIczjE5Izwxpvlwohxc2kGKYPyjh hZwcVavcyO/Z8IgLdZSvVGwaDYjQ5iIxCHRi8= Original-Received: by 10.239.189.12 with SMTP id r12mr6818hbh.129.1275042921265; Fri, 28 May 2010 03:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.239.172.207 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 03:35:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125325 Archived-At: On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:07, Leo wrote: > The only bit that I am unsure is the deleted lines in the following > hunk. i.e. if method is 'kill disregard virtual buffers. Seems like > someone wants to work around a bug. But I don't know what it is so I > didn't implement a similar logic in the added lines. That was me. I doesn't help to show a list of nonexistent buffers when you want to kill an existent one, does it? The only way that would make sense is if killing a virtual buffer removed it from the list for good. Juanma