From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bernardo Barros Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Efforts to attract more users? Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:25:00 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87630m1vnz.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87r5jaywvt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87lj9iyv98.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83bpaeumdx.fsf@gnu.org> <20100711150142.GB3134@muc.de> <834og6uduu.fsf@gnu.org> <87ocecit9b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278955519 23570 80.91.229.12 (12 Jul 2010 17:25:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fplemma@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, Stephen Eilert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, joakim@verona.se, acm@muc.de, eliz@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org, John Yates To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 12 19:25:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYMkk-0006gx-Lc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:25:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42957 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYMkk-0001AQ-03 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50549 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYMkc-00019T-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYMkb-0003im-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:65030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYMkZ-0003hq-4k; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: by pwi8 with SMTP id 8so4752326pwi.0 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:25:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zoDkWmncFSF55JzFDQBU3kvE8MJuo4aa/HxAxTgdEEw=; b=IddvQ0oVJbEGwLO3GsWj582Cbblvu0wGi9cXy1FOdU5K0YJ0XLmSEHY0Qq6p5uZw4/ E7EmDMCjJMIgUEEMlQz8T/WPdQhyn887e6GNtc8p2NRkJtEPBNdl1XkOK9/lEt+YpNJ4 zyH/7+6P8Wr0B0dLi+E7CbqeAza63QN+klJMo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZCEzx1fBNCUFSH+Qanm/3V35Lz7HbF96xrm9CwD8JIsANgvqyLx/6ow5J3xmBMwJbG lvrB6nEF5eGk1JpDrqTxUNnicnOQ/wRLysl0mNMre+f8iC/ZF39wiMHW5T7ZzRWXn4SU 9AFNqI1afFHsRB2bXlTXvVHepixsZwC5llT8o= Original-Received: by 10.114.195.15 with SMTP id s15mr1503916waf.36.1278955500414; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.173.4 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:25:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ocecit9b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127111 Archived-At: many people in the gnu world are using qt4. are there reasons not to consider it? 2010/7/12 Stephen J. Turnbull : > Stephen Eilert writes: > > =C2=A0> Indeed, I am left wondering why [moving to C++] it was even > =C2=A0> proposed in the first place. > > It wasn't. =C2=A0What was proposed is using a well-known cross-platform > widget set. =C2=A0That widget set happens to provide C++ bindings but not= C > bindings. > > It's probably moot since several people who actually have used > wxWidgets in a real project say it's not advantageous over GTK+. > > >