From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hl-line and visual-line Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 00:31:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <45790724-63FC-4B80-A70D-8CD49A92FEE3@gmail.com> <8339xmqob9.fsf@gnu.org> <94F28B33-A04E-4511-B93D-E5471EE4D0DE@gmail.com> <201005210834.28589.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <83wruxpt2z.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274481136 16801 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2010 22:32:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Tassilo Horn , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 00:32:13 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFalG-0000PP-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 00:32:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51650 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFalF-0000YC-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 18:32:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39507 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFal9-0000Xx-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 18:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFal7-0000TT-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 18:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f220.google.com ([209.85.217.220]:37568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFal7-0000TP-0w; Fri, 21 May 2010 18:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so786969gxk.12 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=JaZvIzKIq6zKtUHKVapHsnO6ndtobKftMtmFRpQ4rr4=; b=HfT3FFOt9ivjAduUWVQoYN8NVcgaq3nt+qvHoTeml3krgh6MjV+zl9MpXDuYt7f/xa y5Kucv0gQ46Wxqglp7dV25tyT5IsgjLwL7dqQZvFDFRq8yQlvduY8sCeA4gjQhU9Ff1g zJfPCjk9SeGQx1mNwI29OJF28BQ80e514P3Fo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=DZG6eWNaM0NqtIZNfFlTBcD0RC2gefVH6afOxwWh0zZfH2CCGhGN3g0+vsB3oH8q0h koWs1SbJXnqMZCcMI6YGHhzm9HRiSIItoSvow8J5mj5z7sxx/ophi98d4MR5qjTLAHYF wO0EN5MnrxxZHDYcb0CfEboBEv95DmhFpsUDY= Original-Received: by 10.101.5.18 with SMTP id h18mr2715648ani.120.1274481120238; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125016 Archived-At: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Could we please make the change to have overlays with negative >> priority below text? I have asked for this several times. What is >> holding it back? > > Lack of patch? Didn't I send something for that long ago? I am not sure anymore. I am not even sure I understand the code. Is it just a simple change in face_at_buffer_position in xfaces.c that is needed? Faces are merged there and merging the faces for overlays with negative priorities first seems to be what is needed. However to do that I need Qpriority in xfaces.c. It is however defined in buffer.c. How should that be handled?