From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnulib strftime imported into Emacs Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 01:15:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4D45F788.1020101@cs.ucla.edu> <83r5btg1td.fsf@gnu.org> <4D466C8D.2020102@cs.ucla.edu> <4D473584.6010205@cs.ucla.edu> <4D474C57.1070103@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296519382 25508 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2011 00:16:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 01 01:16:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk3un-0005Yq-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:16:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pk3uj-0007Yy-BQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:16:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48041 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pk3uf-0007Yt-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk3ue-0007ju-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:16:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:64204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk3uc-0007jh-My; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2709027ewy.0 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:16:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pg+L/qaXcDusNzIDRbwq1RgA8TT0uNW8ukUwjuhSF30=; b=G/FWx/Ck5/twTHded5lCdEBE1hst+3f5D4n4U2RbQIaNs2oVik2A3+F2JVIXd8zkVM BtWBza2z+fo1p+4s4VEPdE4aYZdWXk6wVQ88zSGeVNwabYIwwrUV/EOToldESnnDXEcn BSHW8rpudY5mr4SekPaj+OSuZJcS0H3c+HIG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AMGY0Gcs7n1yr37YXgN2wI2S/TozPjHmQ+DqsgUEXGcEOT9pOkMs7rKXv0R8gMz0Fy herQsnLqN+Y4/qfqKFLsGoJwwh36BC0FjiokzBRKs1Xw3l9oEmfNNWdHWdF+88KE3PkJ KBK5zODH2t6zQ0GTauY+dBNrwxR3Ny1glfFgM= Original-Received: by 10.213.114.81 with SMTP id d17mr6371712ebq.28.1296519361717; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:16:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.36.11 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:15:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D474C57.1070103@cs.ucla.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135367 Archived-At: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 01/31/11 14:29, Lennart Borgman wrote: >> I wonder if it would >> help you if other people had a checkout of your branch on w32 and at >> least could test it? Do you have tests for it that we could run on >> w32? > > I don't have a publishable branch right now. =C2=A0What I have is a colle= ction > of several branches, none of which build right now, each of which contain= s > ideas for improving Emacs. =C2=A0When I get something coded up that build= s, > and which I expect might break Windows, I was planning to email it to her= e, > and then Windows-oriented developers can take a quick look at it. Perhaps it would be easier to publish the branch on Launchpad for example? If you do that it is easy to automate the build so at least the build process can be checked. > I don't have special tests. =C2=A0As I understand it, there's no consensu= s > for how "make check" should operate for Emacs. There is currently a test subdirectory in the repository. Can't you put tests there?