From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Differences between ibuffer and dired Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:13:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871vbmnaxk.fsf@escher.home> <38165C775CE64A828DB8008B087373F7@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278029655 10233 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2010 00:14:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Stephen Berman , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Deniz Dogan To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 02 02:14:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUTtO-00025p-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:14:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUTtN-0000lG-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41256 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUTtE-0000kC-57 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUTtD-0003JS-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:43078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUTtC-0003JO-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:13:55 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1391400iwn.0 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:13:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/r2tMPvmYAo0OF+AId2RWbU6ivy11+X8OX7hrsupzb0=; b=PFbp2+Zh493BGdrJOJ2bO0R8wNMhVd4UqSReTO6zNAJ4dNPV5Dr9aowtwP+Hd2tCA5 WgwENtc7ECH7RVxFlhCqVUTDFah0hfvDJ4fWqt7hPB67C+LzsGYY2tRTHwfMQvmYUquO LFbir1J8wlfE4S54FaoiRL2plmlFnyM70sdgQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ScWDL5OIwjw54z8CfRaZMPihrvnt3wGpUgrYkGtpNFKlFi+V1r4zFlbqGcD4gtLC8M Qaiw3Zu7P8jUFMuu8xDd8o2x+hYuxNOlqrxHuaUoyHq5bFVpEzkuKRuzJSaXgKKtA5zF Zogrh2EdKr3VxKcg22JcLZQgAPmiFfJ1a0KF8= Original-Received: by 10.231.203.15 with SMTP id fg15mr217274ibb.187.1278029634128; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.172.210 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:13:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126666 Archived-At: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Drew Adams wrote: >> While we are looking at this: > > You mean making some keys more consistent between ibuffer and dired? See Subject > line. > >> Wasn't there a discussion before about putting ibuffer on C-x C-b? > > ? > No connection with the current subject. > >> I don't remember, someone had something to >> say about this. Was it Juri? > > > 1. Why? > 2. Why would you bring that up here, in this discussion? I think you want to say that for you it is easier to keep those subjects separate. I can try to remember to respect that, but for me it is easier to do it the way I did it here. There are simply different thinking styles.