From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Emacs-Devel devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:10:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikFV_XtDmb6CgT6VU1LkNb5mNqtUjQP0j80wLdf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83d3pv92az.fsf@gnu.org>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:57:39 +0100
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
>> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:56:11 +0100
>> >> Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> >>
>> >> >> > Because it's pointless. If we want to give users release binaries
>> >> >> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please explain why you think that.
>> >> >
>> >> > I just did, above.
>> >>
>> >> In what way is "pointless" an explanation?
>> >
>> > I meant the second sentence.
>>
>> Can you then explain if you think there is any reason not to ship the
>> release binaries with debug info?
>
> I said it is slightly better, that's all. The reason is disk space,
> of course: 30MB is a lot for a binary.
Why do you then think it is pointless to ship both binaries with debug
info and without it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-23 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 22:11 emacs-20101122 windows binaries Sean Sieger
2010-11-23 2:20 ` Eric Lilja
2010-11-23 14:06 ` Eric Lilja
2010-11-23 15:02 ` Jason Rumney
2010-11-23 16:01 ` Sean Sieger
2010-11-23 16:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-23 18:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-23 18:39 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-11-23 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-23 19:28 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-11-23 19:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-23 19:56 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-11-23 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <AANLkTimwK2svWBCGocR0zT5=qDsn3Z6=kUK=Wz0VqYYk@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <83d3pv92az.fsf@gnu.org>
2010-11-23 21:10 ` Lennart Borgman [this message]
2010-11-23 21:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-23 21:33 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-11-24 2:11 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-11-24 3:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-23 23:00 ` Jason Rumney
2010-11-23 23:06 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-11-24 4:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-24 14:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-25 23:43 ` Sean Sieger
2010-11-23 23:42 ` Drew Adams
2010-11-24 2:15 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-11-24 5:14 ` Drew Adams
2010-11-24 9:56 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikFV_XtDmb6CgT6VU1LkNb5mNqtUjQP0j80wLdf@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).