From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MON KEY Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: force-mode-line-update ALL argument Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 01:39:25 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274506780 9642 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2010 05:39:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 05:39:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 07:39:39 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFhQx-00083R-Ae for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 07:39:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFhQw-00043q-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 01:39:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37952 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFhQm-00042Y-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 01:39:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFhQl-000609-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 01:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:33370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFhQl-000601-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 01:39:27 -0400 Original-Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1091812gyg.0 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 22:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.3.3 with SMTP id f3mr4076382ybi.117.1274506765525; Fri, 21 May 2010 22:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.143.21 with HTTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 22:39:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Sender-Auth: jB4TI2G1qGMMA9doQO2TalaN_jo X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125037 Archived-At: > at least as silly as Martin in understanding how that should work... By making `other-buffer' the current-buffer we're effectively asking Emacs to select some buffer which is _not_ visible and updating _its_ modeline as well if it has changed recently. An other non-visible buffer on the current frame which is not visible but has been modified (a modeline change counting as such) will tickle the buffer-modified-p predicate thereby forcing _all_ non-visible buffers on current frame to have their modeline updated... FWICG :P /s_P\