From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: State of the CEDET merge Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:39:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877hc7lzcc.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8762rq7w7h.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871v2en9n1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871v2eyece.fsf_-_@engster.org> <87r5ad91dm.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> <87zkp1solk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wrk54pzp.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> <87lj0kr7y3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4D7B7201.6050208@siege-engine.com> <87tyf7glbd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v29wk8b.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300135209 16326 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2011 20:40:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?TGx1w61z?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 14 21:40:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzEYc-0004SM-Ne for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:40:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzEYb-0003oX-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56211 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzEYW-0003nd-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:39:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzEYV-0001dK-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:42567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzEYV-0001dD-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so1755379eyh.0 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:39:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uMyIynNI0r6vHdiwr6o8wQdcd7uNN06O4XFH3WXf158=; b=Yfy5OXLxPi6+jqxO3ISNr17WwAM7YEhOybCJyfMfMZ1DZM+5tC6xmrfHMzGoIgztii Tkbr087LexxcB6LEmKUlpqBSno+r0p9Ta34A1HNR0TwqXjUaLPaqtlUznX6VPFcjhasq OtJjP1NdjCEhcQGU2ngbq/1BtMUXGirrbvDCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=R9vGcHxrCUKrwL8iUeDJGJlC6k5lWnWUrFOzapHbh+kPElmcQWoZZCd1ROjqU8MPRp StXoz31L0HJg6vrM4KdLTcTycLSR/L5yqXD35RPS68XKibUwTwda6F3JQmPIFFPFOXoP IFWPvyuStDSC+XNwpr5fJ6nmZC+ze+kC00VbE= Original-Received: by 10.213.113.201 with SMTP id b9mr1680620ebq.60.1300135194091; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.27.136 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:39:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871v29wk8b.fsf@ginnungagap.bsc.es> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137226 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Llu=C3=ADs wrote: > > Thanks, I'll have a look at it, but I think the discussion we had here > settled down to merging only in the cedet to emacs direction (using a > branch in cedet that were only meant to merge into > emacs). > > Unfortunately, this would force changes from the emacs community to be > applied into the cedet repository. Is that decision (and an explanation) written down somewhere? (And does bzr contain any tool to protect it?)