From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fren Zeee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:27:34 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87fwyy261p.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20100801.140650.297219757.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <87bp9lto70.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280773667 2745 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2010 18:27:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Harald Hanche-Olsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 02 20:27:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofzjj-00030Z-Qj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:27:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41836 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ofzjj-0002qs-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37757 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ofzjd-0002qn-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofzjb-0005LD-Vy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:57966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofzjb-0005Ks-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so1847791gxk.0 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:27:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=STQwNVc3X/D9186awvKUvuC85UHjERRmhurzpiHmlkk=; b=gfCh9YAGbZ7znFZAkhHpAyOBuuJ0IwZC5qaY/Vy+wKv4Zol7l9WoPjllHIz7e29jSp rcomK+mKxOzfPvLjPXWA8biyqpyrGCVPSswX70VVvkTC/fSCbNFiPUxW698vwW2dv8/G xE307UNONYI3iVYGJDCHr29l8DmKPJE5FBmHQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=US+xC+qchZ+TRAyFSG4u0Vkw6UmXt0xoFqTGDRuae91TPFWTR/lDyXillnJSdm5WIl T98NDw9YjrBfGTQDC1D+w1OB9bgKc35lc64Cu4dH+fiVd43chgl3Pqou4qj2rVVYeaMK dTLVI8LZVT8rB9Qu3H4mSNDdDNcUlfOAlU9kw= Original-Received: by 10.150.47.5 with SMTP id u5mr7636229ybu.147.1280773654725; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.199.80 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:27:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bp9lto70.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128146 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wr= ote: > Harald Hanche-Olsen writes: > =A0> + David Kastrup : > =A0> > =A0> > Distributing Emacs without corresponding source to the byte code i= s a > =A0> > violation of its license. > =A0> > =A0> Is it? I thought you only had to offer access to the source code. > > Normally you have to offer access to source in the same way as you > offer access to binaries. =A0You don't need to bundle them in the same > medium, but normally they're available more or less side by side. > > Under certain circumstances the object code may be conveyed separately > from the source, but the conditions are pretty onerous (it must be a > physical product, and it must be accompanied with a paper certificate > promising that *anybody* with a copy of the object code can get it > from you); it's unlikely that the OP received his code that way. > > I'm less than impressed with the OP's complaints, of course. I am not complaining. Its just that I dont have it, and need to find source matching this old executable, which means that it will take some time to search for the particular freeze or tar file if it is still on the web. > > >