From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `about-emacs' - what about the revno? Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:58:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83occmlogo.fsf@gnu.org> <87tymcq9so.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283191521 12228 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2010 18:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 20:05:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq8jP-0007vV-HC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:05:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44439 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oq8jO-0003im-S5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59622 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oq8cy-0008Ce-1W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq8cw-0003b2-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:52757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq8cw-0003ay-CC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so6734982qwf.0 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:58:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DozLZ+F+72sdP0L8Gyklzh2rx7kJIQBYRekR9QNjZQQ=; b=khCkl2l9iosDLGHpOxCBYL6NXd1fGJZ6Tg/sdDQm/AeAJyPeUJbxfgGuaEUehOjXAN d0WXGh2UXTOVozeSqXWMWI2DHCmQchdTpZ1j6OoICv+Wb741FYFIFHkonKastiC7ZDGw Mk7SVHf140+dC86+CJnGFmBjfuI3hp6GPXCHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BDajDJz2N49ZKxligJTOmFUAEEv+LJ6DwMRHT6UQavVuI6iP2aYDbKj7Dk+9YhKmO1 iBcc2JumrsAOL6KQnilB5AlY9pridC1g4jc131utA6U8zGZsoq2yuZShsVT8+f2DSF4R 2XRbW83R8vWgyGxL2Y/b6IRrmIclO1Mb7vBeY= Original-Received: by 10.229.250.203 with SMTP id mp11mr3270052qcb.173.1283191117475; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.20.139 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tymcq9so.fsf@telefonica.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129442 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:39 PM, =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> This has come up before, but the discussion was inconclusive (IIRC) >>> because of 2 reasons: >> >>> =C2=A0 . revno is not unique: two different branches can have the same >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 revno for two very different code bases >> >> Maybe we should try and provide the revno of the common ancestor on >> the trunk. > > That information only makes sense for mirrors of trunk. > > The revision-id is the real info. The fact that it is inconvenient to > handle is no excuse for doing the wrong thing. And revnos are definitely > the wrong thing to look at when determining which source code was used > for a build. This information below is what is presented in my patched Emacs. Does that seems enough? (The information is fetched as I described before in this thread.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This Emacs was built from sources in bazaar identified as: Nick 'trunk' info: revision id: michael.albinus@gmx.de-20100810095815-466r7u9diofu8f0n revno: 101040 date: 2010-08-10 11:58:15 +0200 Nick 'emacsw32' (from 'trunk') info: revision id: lennart.borgman@gmail.com-20100810151436-zc9x1d8h6g98edom revno: 99334 date: 2010-08-10 17:14:36 +0200 [back] [forward] <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<