From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Deprecate _emacs on Windows Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:00:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <0B6A6EC5FD8F46D697F914FB2F6D4304@us.oracle.com> <655D5DBB48F04F719130122440CDA29B@us.oracle.com> <9DFDF596429B48FA9473B7C303E53C66@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300849305 24021 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2011 03:01:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 03:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 04:01:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2EKJ-0002BO-Rb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:01:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42219 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2EKJ-0003bP-5f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:01:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48196 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2EKF-0003bK-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:01:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2EKE-0004RL-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:01:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:53548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2EKD-0004RD-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so7127899qyk.0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:01:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pbGv8g7A88R4UnUop0StymybMRIBuQ2dr0QJP2Xr77o=; b=OWThHq+BTfnffUCk9gLqBAjSIJKUcElnQVF+U2S5bFihArkUK3ZWnd1cbNPZ+XHDtL 7QsYSab5+9XBejngx9bwGWABsIYXY9+bdb3d/7vtD0U2/li94ovUCh3SaJQLAz5p4Kf0 i29+JtqwPQwl16rEaixkl1D7xBHiLgz8WIJGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Cm5b9L5rNiNyqKtT+O/hsC9YJIoDV/5W55IsinsQZOC82KgAD9xKDsFcq77t0kZlW4 m2uO3/O7zDBdkicnNgI27mJBGWs4wXx3QdKC1KDJBDAwpwCqz0ZiWQiZPUkTAgnz1y3I j+cJ8N+fqzLc8SPC+a0C2SRfiI7/V0MNi5VHc= Original-Received: by 10.229.115.18 with SMTP id g18mr4496239qcq.246.1300849293126; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.94.207 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:00:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9DFDF596429B48FA9473B7C303E53C66@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.216.176 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137552 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:42, Drew Adams wrote: > Yes, that part of your post was ad hominem. =C2=A0But it was not an _argu= ment_ at > all. =C2=A0It was nothing but name-calling. =C2=A0I am not patronizing yo= u just because I > give arguments about a growing tendency to overuse of so-called "warnings= ". =C2=A0I > gave reasons why this has been happening. Giving a long lecture about your opinions of worldwide trends in corporate legal practices, because you don't like a warning in Emacs... well, yes, that's patronizing. If you want to consider my opinion about your lectures an ad hominem attack, suit yourself. > That I disagree with issuing the warning message doesn't make this about = me. > Unless you take the view that whenever someone disagrees with you it's ab= out > him. Of course. That's part of my James Bond villain persona. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma