From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Deniz Dogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:35:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83lj6zz9o0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp7setll.fsf@altern.org> <871v8obqya.fsf@altern.org> <87tylkzkia.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284986179 17770 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2010 12:36:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 14:36:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxfbV-0003Cj-53 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:36:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38599 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxfbU-00024t-Kb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54279 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxfbN-00024l-PY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxfbL-0007CP-SR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:41371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxfbL-0007CI-PB; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so4397370vws.0 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:36:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GrcGILaRp2UMV6lJy9Wdk6KHLrmZeudRSCJ555v2XCE=; b=D0jFoSuQX+PzOzN24fknxV4gIt2UgYgUXihMguQjHlPiu6JT84U9gsT/hC4o7K9vS6 IYo4f0cReb+ClV6BMeH4DKtEcPDkh9bcYz1DPb780+xKTU2PInArPHv7fpelNm3E1Scx 68S7gHt3gla4auiqkI1mjl3EKp4myHP3lsCtw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=c7E790uhKklxgms+oWzPHmrFqOyCV6lZA2OoDjkaogOPY2MvjQFby/HHAzS5/32lUT R8elGTvraAxamSZ5D2p6d6fYpLl8N2/XBuiTpV3JIwnOFUlMjJNGISJqVgyiNRPwFcgz wIjIeZHAijR1ZtYGsGfof2uaDKzOr2dH48pcc= Original-Received: by 10.220.161.201 with SMTP id s9mr5415579vcx.137.1284986166539; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.202.70 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:35:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tylkzkia.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130530 Archived-At: 2010/9/20 David Kastrup : > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> From: Bastien >>> Cc: lennart.borgman@gmail.com, =A0rms@gnu.org, =A0emacs-devel@gnu.org, = =A0monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, =A0drew.adams@oracle.com, =A0miles@gnu.org >>> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:21:49 +0200 >>> >>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>> >>> >> But besides that, is there any reason why no poll has been made so f= ar? >>> > >>> > Because we know better without any polls? >>> >>> The problem is we all might have a different interpretation of "we". >> >> I meant _my_ interpretation. > > Shouldn't that read "We meant _our_ interpretation" for consistency? > I think Eli means "his" interpretation of "we". I wonder how we should interpret that... --=20 Deniz Dogan