From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stuart Hacking Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is unbound? Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:53:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87sjx7z7w4.fsf@telefonica.net> <83pqsbmf6j.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4ijz07h.fsf@telefonica.net> <2460D97DEA4047B3B9DF92C4A80981EF@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294840448 6522 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2011 13:54:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 12 14:54:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pd19G-0001X7-3L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:54:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pd19F-0001xi-HK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53236 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pd197-0001wW-Nb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pd196-0008Ry-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:53:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:41393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pd196-0008RL-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:53:52 -0500 Original-Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so568606iwn.0 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:53:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yJlNx+s1M5rzEVGQ1LffEzSjpjR6X1sm7ytKdt2e5Uo=; b=Kyt/G9s9uDV8UCk6isSh60t6wtpFm9EcGljEmWzWX+IjYoKnf7SsjjxgfPBmZeNsBh QTCBnlYNyyk+fVfi9fBs+VwdKf4g1JxRKkFqEtz1+7Pb2qUNCu4H3XN3LiouPF8N+YN1 TzbPS3s5zPshhRrd0RoohzZ8sHoTU1VDxmy14= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RE6hucq3Uo/vbS5KoNj5YyEHH8hPTRwgUtmQ+CS9iElGxWYvuKB4ISetL/+JFopKkB nDuJZMo/5NULamXIbXfx87mW41PHlY3aXCTmm9+Z/WnOVYj2tAy7sNz2H3EKJd6GbYxP AOsyK3fzJLpKIXW9g3fyU3fmtr/N0IG1Zz1b0= Original-Received: by 10.231.192.73 with SMTP id dp9mr999407ibb.20.1294840430640; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:53:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.143.10.14 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:53:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2460D97DEA4047B3B9DF92C4A80981EF@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134461 Archived-At: On 10 January 2011 01:01, Drew Adams wrote: > >> I think the binding of Alt-F4 is not that important in a non-multi >> document interface (but that is just my opinion). > > There is no reason for Emacs to bind Alt-F4 (or M-f4) by default. > It should be kept for anyone to bind to anything. =C2=A0(Just one more op= inion.) > On the other hand, it wouldn't be a big deal for Emacs to have a default binding. Anyone who cares enough will be able to rebind it. There's always discussion about making Emacs a more well behaved application on Windows and this seems like a low-hanging fruit?