From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CMake build anyone? Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:42:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87aapfxyhc.fsf@telefonica.net> <87wrsjwijl.fsf@telefonica.net> <83mxtfb7uo.fsf@gnu.org> <874ofnw8j4.fsf@telefonica.net> <83hbjnaqli.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280115758 25297 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2010 03:42:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 26 05:42:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdEaE-0003OX-Ob for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:42:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdEaE-000057-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33317 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdEa9-0008W5-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdEa7-0004um-TD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:42:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:62552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdEa7-0004ue-OI; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:42:23 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3099477bwz.0 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:42:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SiHeBN6sST9wQrnUxVCuerTyz2LhaYW6dOGCLtTxmzM=; b=TLRkSfCs6PlrmlGMf487I4I+xXPxktSiEDzbcELP4rx8KUimvfeT+1fQtM3+jx9oVW F4MoIply4qWRgMMWRDNlgZRzSgORRYfoZkduAnIYuMoMncUmDCFA0zhO2Fs08/kobKdg nYXyqJtCUfABYLV8OZ4o3Yz10KzitQVmlxf5g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XUkmZdSD2/88ul8I3qx3Q/xzW0PGbuZGofEJzPEpNb/zglv3p/QrAL9qQ9V9zlG6Y6 ku9tF6F2qkJqGgl8T50lNPzZLK4bChLkNypfd9Wn+h+4/dOlSaSZE5YGCHkr/72CIyai i/Nacd0muXw+SwIMRYLSJUrXACIGNtm/VdzpI= Original-Received: by 10.204.73.211 with SMTP id r19mr4856130bkj.131.1280115742569; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.180.136 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:42:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83hbjnaqli.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127816 Archived-At: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:07, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The Windows build requires only `cp' and `rm' Also makeinfo, etc. if the user wants to build info files. > I think it's inconvenient even on GNU/Linux. Well, that means that we will never be able to switch to another build system; all will have some external requirements. But I think the point is that =C3=93scar is not proposing switching to it, but having the two side by side. That has upsides and downsides (one of them being that you have to maintain two mutually incompatible build systems, with the oportunity to neglect one of them). I must confess that I would prefer what I was asking for: a tool to make (re)generation of the makefiles easier, instead. Now, I think I know what you will say: that tool exists, and it's called "sed" ;-) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma