From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 04:19:40 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83ftciqhea.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="74716"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, joaotavora@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 21:20:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxgi-000JLz-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 21:20:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxgh-0007ch-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40840) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxfv-0006gJ-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:19:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxft-0008Gy-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from pv50p00im-ztdg10012101.me.com ([17.58.6.49]:48737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUxft-0008Ga-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:19:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1588447184; bh=UhwouyMmOvfjo/SKEeaCeUsMz756mnIsedZEPZjvz9A=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=CInjMQjWfbdYrExq0/vssSJC8L8CwCE2zLLyf8xp6fBfhAvUCVA4xr6aaCuTRmwZ3 rgWnDqZ0ZPCcO78DscP6iSOxCnmKI4aSSqGZieFzGjPdJg02/BvS8eBRo1yhnlMJ4q pr9vlwlvc9g/HBgwcIQa9qsUZm3yCq+D35G4BRNQpZc9W6TdTDaPhB9qwRMqJ9GRD/ v9HYixaPjTXZPEajL9il5mLTuBi56GfDAgfhacHh3dTBmjqlBi/0KJteDlXYAP28pd LrWXzRpq0+2PcVmGcu7HlCwyxCSXMMyjcD7WkLOpvF2iKL+8inTtSmVGRW5PUHRBgk kxahIYSIvKsSA== Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [1.230.108.64]) by pv50p00im-ztdg10012101.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4C97840376; Sat, 2 May 2020 19:19:43 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83ftciqhea.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E262) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-02_10:2020-05-01, 2020-05-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=18 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=719 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2005020169 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=17.58.6.49; envelope-from=pcr910303@icloud.com; helo=pv50p00im-ztdg10012101.me.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 14:10:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Received-From: 17.58.6.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248550 Archived-At: > 2020. 5. 3. =EC=98=A4=EC=A0=84 4:15, Eli Zaretskii =EC=9E=91= =EC=84=B1: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >> From: =EC=A1=B0=EC=84=B1=EB=B9=88 >> Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 03:53:37 +0900 >> Cc: Emacs developers , >> monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >> joaotavora@gmail.com, >> rms@gnu.org, >> dgutov@yandex.ru >>>> So, if I would rename concat, it would be concat-to-string. >>> But then people who need to concatenate strings will not find it, >>> because they will type string- TAB. >> I can=E2=80=99t understand the sarcasm here. >=20 > There is no sarcasm. I=E2=80=99m sorry about the misunderstanding there then. If it becomes a serious problem, then (as I have mentioned it in the last ma= il,) we can alias it as string-concat, list-concat, and so on. But prefixing the functions that aren=E2=80=99t polymorphic (and isn=E2=80=99= t as controversial as concat) would be first.=