From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Xfree86 and the Meta key (+patch) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:15:15 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1096664425.415dc569492f0@imp2-q.free.fr> <1096788855.415fab777a9aa@imp1-q.free.fr> <1096905302.4161725657e30@imp2-q.free.fr> <1097010444.41630d0c187cd@imp4-q.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097010979 12877 80.91.229.6 (5 Oct 2004 21:16:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 21:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 05 23:16:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CEwfJ-000353-00 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 23:16:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEwlx-0007ub-TD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CEwlp-0007uS-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:22:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CEwlp-0007u6-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:22:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEwlp-0007u1-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:22:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CEweu-0005U4-Fz; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain ([213.115.26.74] [213.115.26.74]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20041005211543.LWAU3239.mxfep01.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain>; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:15:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1097010444.41630d0c187cd@imp4-q.free.fr> Original-To: jerome.marant@free.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27960 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27960 > >> In other words, should we ask them to revert it, or should we accept >> it as an improvement in X? > > The latter. Jan D. did some tests and commited the patch. As far as I > know, > it is backward compatible. Jan, do you confirm? Yes, with a possible reservation for that Solaris machine. I did test Solaris on x86, and it was OK there, so the Sparc machine may have been a bad configuration. I'll try to get access to it again. Jan D.