From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: ECB Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:01:43 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141773978 5718 80.91.229.2 (7 Mar 2006 23:26:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 23:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 08 00:26:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGlZG-0004Fz-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:26:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGlZF-0003as-Vy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfZP-0002iG-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:01:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfZK-0002fU-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:01:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGfZK-0002fA-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.76.162.229] (helo=world1.sdm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FGfbr-0007us-OW; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: by world1.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp from mucns1.muc.sdm.de ([193.102.180.22]) id 1FGfZA-0001La-Lq; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:01:44 +0100 Original-Received: by mucns1.muc.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sdmmail1.sdm.de) id 1FGfZA-0005yY-KG; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:01:44 +0100 Original-Received: from mucmail1.sdm.de ([193.102.180.175]) by sdmmail1.sdm.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:01:44 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ECB Thread-Index: AcZCBvcUyloq4vazSO6rNRa+JF+/CwAAOw2Q Original-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2006 17:01:44.0092 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFD915C0:01C64208] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51336 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> But for now: Are there some work-arounds possible how to exclude some >> windows from being "balanced" (means ajusted) by the new >> balance-window? In the old one an advice for `walk-windows' was >> enough which simply does not walk through these special windows... >> But now, `walk-windows' is not used but `window-tree'... >=20 > balance-windows should obey `window-size-fixed'. I don't know > whether it does, and neither do I know whether ECB can use it.=20 Ah, very interesting - supposed balance-windos obeys window-sized-fixed then ECB could advice `balance-window' and setting window-sized-fix to t = temporally for the buffers displayed by the special ECB-windows (which should be = ignored for balancing)... Is not a generall solution for such problems (i mentioned in my posting) = but sounds like a promising workaround for making newest balance-windows compatible = with ECB... Thanks! Ciao, Klaus >=20 >=20 > Stefan