From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Issue with rectangle mouse selection Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:12:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4726417A-97DA-492B-8A56-1B08BF016CD1@acm.org> <20191128171117.tgxqnqnjl4lttvwj@Ergus> <96AD0983-D0FA-42B9-9063-B347CDE720F1@acm.org> <20191129143956.6kjcnpzdj463e5d3@Ergus> <78251E2C-8618-4591-9C12-2A127295B606@acm.org> <20191130170240.q72zwzn5tfx4hdw7@Ergus> <20191130212837.hyolxychqhybaapb@Ergus> <20191201062403.cagwz6fabtqlwtyz@Ergus> <20191203094005.yafztnang7gr7xzs@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="257329"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Emacs developers To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 13:44:49 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7Xs-0014pp-I9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 13:44:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52814 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7Xp-0000i7-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 07:44:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7TW-0006Ez-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 07:40:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7TV-00054M-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 07:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1472c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.72]:32912 helo=mail102c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7TU-0004tZ-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 07:40:17 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1575367932; bh=wBHXTmNGyf+wxQY4VfmASE8gh1Fzrnw6Z3X+Q+MJ5l8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=M+pFwv90dwTT5dwDNrrMD3qWOPWMC9QQP6xU27Q9cngIBK+1Ms2FEtyNKQUXeqceU FgAFPfDVufztkZkHKitEJAIcNpX32/dDCRtTQfoFRcav4g528Oo0giYkZ2VccuTZJJ JBBpip/zkMgiOnT3yPB5ZBpcYlpk5ogxE3QKXsCs= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from stanniol.lan (c-6f4fe655.032-75-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se [85.230.79.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail102c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id xB3ACAu4010883; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:12:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20191203094005.yafztnang7gr7xzs@Ergus> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020C.5DE634FC.004C, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=Q8qsHL+a c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=fHaj9vQUQVKQ4sUldAaXuQ==:117 a=fHaj9vQUQVKQ4sUldAaXuQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=xItWlVOfV1TulnUNEwEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.136.14.72 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243042 Archived-At: 3 dec. 2019 kl. 10.40 skrev Ergus : > Personally I don't find the variable very useful cause the actual > defaults are good enough for most of the cases. And removing the > variable can simplify code a bit... but that's your choice. We seem to have made the correct choice then. It is clear that that = variable should not be user-tunable. Thanks for testing!