From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Glitches with the GTK toolkit Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:49:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87vfj49yqr.fsf@marant.org> <1084262636.40a088ec37014@imp4-q.free.fr> <1084300258.40a11be25a438@imp3-q.free.fr> <87isf27kxl.fsf@marant.org> <87ad0e7ima.fsf@marant.org> <41DEC7C6.70601@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105179738 21632 80.91.229.6 (8 Jan 2005 10:22:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 08 11:22:09 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CnDjU-0003sq-00 for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 11:22:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CnDut-0000cc-Bc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:33:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CnDlP-0005pG-Vi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:24:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CnDlN-0005nZ-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:24:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CnDiV-0004pC-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CnDF5-00012R-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain ([83.226.180.210] [83.226.180.210]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050108095041.DTHL27327.mxfep01.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain>; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:50:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: Original-To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32030 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32030 >>>>>> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:32:54 +0100, "Jan D." >>>>>> said: > >> On GTK I actually don't see any difference, but on OSX I do. It is an >> improvement, and slower machines will probably benefit. Does this >> affect any other operations that dragging the mode line? > > Yes. Dragging the scroll bar thumb, which is currently implemented > using `track-mouse' on OSX, would behave as if redisplay-dont-pause > were set to `t'. Dragging the thumb updates only a few lines on slow > machines without the patch. I think pausing during redisplay is good > for other kinds of events, but not for mouse movements because they > usually come with a short interval. The scroll bar dragging becomes smoother on OSX. I think this patch should be checked in. As you say, mouse movements comes in bursts so pausing doesn't need to be done. Jan D.