From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bozhidar Batsov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Is there such a thing as an "rcc" version or do we have a typo in version-regexp-alist? Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:45:21 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5284fe21_7bd3ee7b_a9" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384447549 32279 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2013 16:45:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:45:49 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 17:45:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vh03B-0000Zs-G3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:45:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vh03A-0002i4-JI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vh02w-0002e4-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vh02o-0000F6-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]:65120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vh02n-0000Es-Qx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:45:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y10so2228523wgg.26 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:45:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=As39OnsUFFoZn9q3xtG7NFKpSPUR5+4d5pY09iyZr0s=; b=vdz+SgZELQJHsko2bzm8z3VPwASiNZFNeStEWuzEab2kDFFAkSYyL7A53I1sv/ohEA snkEy/k6uAH0uRxKE1tv5bHVph9uxMk1x/gLh4/olN3X4U1MtppurtW1MJZ7McORIHNX iCj+2DXVYc8gJpFCEDa4GiVCQmhLmSNEbFA8IksthjxbuEQoWNpAB1m4BX/GtaEixzbp NnRmrbKtsyPrFGx8QJQo/rJJE+XUSlUKMO2jptbda9HkFCMHiHRfHTevlOtxAzJY10ep DCCci5/X9jeHNy9QaaIKPMpihjKz7qv6c5Z1b4eSBAopYnsEpnIuEeqbH4Vw8RvsnCkx z+PA== X-Received: by 10.194.120.100 with SMTP id lb4mr2088357wjb.79.1384447524055; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:45:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.28] ([95.87.231.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm1211406eeg.4.2013.11.14.08.45.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:45:23 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165257 Archived-At: --5284fe21_7bd3ee7b_a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi guys, =20 I=E2=80=99ve noticed that =60version-regexp-alist=E2=80=99 has support fo= r =E2=80=9Crcc=E2=80=9D versions: (=22=5E=5B-=5F+ =5D=3F=5C=5C(pre=5C=5C=7Crcc=5C=5C)=24=22 . -1) Seems to me this is some typo and it meant to say =E2=80=9Crc=E2=80=9D, s= ince I=E2=80=99ve never heard of an =E2=80=9Crcc=22 version. Still I want= ed to ask about your opinion before correcting this. =20 -- =20 Cheers, Bozhidar --5284fe21_7bd3ee7b_a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hi guys,

I=E2=80=99ve noticed that =60vers= ion-regexp-alist=E2=80=99 has support for =E2=80=9Crcc=E2=80=9D vers= ions:

<= div>(=22=5E=5B-=5F+ =5D=3F=5C=5C(pre=5C=5C=7Crcc=5C=5C)=24=22   &nbs= p;   . -1)

= Seems to me this is some typo and it meant to say =E2=80=9Crc=E2=80=9D= , since I=E2=80=99ve never heard of an =E2=80=9Crcc=22 version. Stil= l I wanted to ask about your opinion before correcting this.
=

-- 
Cheers,
=
Bozhidar

--5284fe21_7bd3ee7b_a9--