From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recursive compilation? Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:50:55 -0400 Message-ID: <9ok4d1lc3k.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <83d3iuds7y.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcwld1fh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307209882 2035 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2011 17:51:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 04 19:51:18 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSv0H-0006Ty-W9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:51:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59104 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSv0G-0006Z3-VQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSuzz-0006YV-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSuzx-0002k3-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSuzx-0002jz-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:50:57 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58373) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSuzv-0006gP-Em; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:50:55 -0400 X-Spook: Saudi Arabia Bin Laden Panama Delta Force S Box George W. X-Ran: T2GkE8v/.w>c:s^e5y#BG^D*:D06IK;;*-{S(b~}mqIH3y%|K:Xj~-:9L&4hAsyS{kZ5%X X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83vcwld1fh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:08:34 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140178 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Even in the Makefile's, I'm not sure it should be an obvious default: > there could be important use cases when you'd want the warning/error > even when building Emacs, e.g. when making a release or pretest > tarball. Releases and pretests (as per admin/make-tarball.txt) are Made The Right Way, ie by bootstrapping, so it's not an issue for them.